Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California


File Size: 15.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 9, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 679 Words, 4,236 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/197933/67-1.pdf

Download Declaration in Support - District Court of California ( 15.8 kB)


Preview Declaration in Support - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05895-WHA

Document 67

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-752-3100 Facsimile: 650-853-1038 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys For Defendants CONAIR CORPORATION and RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONAIR CORPORATION, SCUNCI INT'L, LTD., RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., L&N SALES & MARKETING, INC., and DOES, 1 ­ 10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA

DECLARATION OF THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS CONAIR CORPORATION'S AND RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP.'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF

I, Thomas F. Fitzpatrick, declare: 1. I am the attorney of record for Defendant Conair Corporation ("Conair") and Rite Aid

HDQTRS. Corp. ("Rite Aid") in the above captioned action. Accordingly, I am familiar with the facts and circumstances of this case. 2. Tonytail commenced this action in November 2007 by filing its Complaint for

Damages ("Tonytail's Complaint"). 3. In its Complaint, Tonytail asserts causes of action against numerous defendants arising

out of the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,263,884 ("the `884 Patent"), and D453,239 ("the `239 Patent"). A true and accurate copy of the `884 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A true and accurate copy of the `239 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 1
DECLARATION OF THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS CONAIR CORPORATION'S AND RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF Case No. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA

Case 3:07-cv-05895-WHA

Document 67

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4.

In the specification of the `884 Patent, the patentee expressly disavowed U.S. Patent

No. 5,899,211 to Brown ("the Brown `211 patent"). A true and accurate copy of the Brown `211 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 5. Like the devices disclosed in the Brown `211 patent, the ponytail devices manufactured

and sold by Conair and Rite Aid (hereinafter, "the Accused Products") have an elastic band permanently attached to only one end of a length of synthetic hair. Indeed, not only are the accused products nearly identical to those disclosed in the prior art Brown `211 Patent ­ the accused products are in fact manufactured under a license to the Brown `211 patent. 6. During prosecution, the patentee amended its claims to overcome an obviousness

rejection over U.S. Patent No. 2,567,119 to Naidor, ("the Naidor `119 patent") in light of the Brown `211 Patent. A true and accurate copy of the Naidor `119 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 7. A true and accurate copy of the patentee's Response to Office Action dated Oct. 17,

2000 is attached hereto as Exhibit E. 8. In this case, Plaintiff has expressly declined to assert infringement of any claim under

the doctrine of equivalents. A true and accurate copy of Plaintiff's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, at 12 (stating: "[e]ach limitation of each asserted claims, U.S. Patent No. 431,693, Claim 1, U.S. Patent No. D453,239 S, Claim 1 and US Patent No. 6,263,884, Claims 4 and 5 are literally present and are not alleged to be present under the doctrine of equivalents," (emphasis added) is attached as Exhibit F. 9. At the time the application that matured into the `884 Patent was filed, the definition of

"continuous" was "uninterrupted in extent; without a break." A true and accurate copy of a computer print out of the definition as found in The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company (2000) is attached hereto as Exhibit G. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: May 9, 2008 /s/ Thomas F. Fitpatrick Thomas F. Fitzpatrick

-2DECLARATION OF THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS CONAIR CORPORATION'S AND RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF Case No. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA