Free Case Management Scheduling Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 21, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 359 Words, 2,140 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/197682/10.pdf

Download Case Management Scheduling Order - District Court of California ( 19.9 kB)


Preview Case Management Scheduling Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05730-WHA

Document 10

Filed 02/21/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 After a case management conference, the Court enters the following order pursuant to 17 Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 18 1. 19 on pain of preclusion under FRCP 37(c). 20 2. 21 FEBRUARY 29, 2008. 22 3. 23 question is the extent to which the "administrative record" should be augmented 24 and/or discovery allowed. To tee up this issue, the following procedure will be used. 25 On APRIL 27, 2008, defendant shall file the "administrative record" and its motion for 26 summary judgment to be heard on a 35-day track. In this submission, please include a 27 detailed declaration explaining what is and is not in the "administrative record" and the 28 manner and guidelines by which it was compiled Then, plaintiff's opposition and any This is an ERISA action challenging a denial of disability benefits. A threshold Leave to add any new parties or pleading amendments must be sought by All initial disclosures under FRCP 26 must be completed by FEBRUARY 29, 2008, / v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN DENIAL-OF-BENEFITS ACTION UNDER ERISA RITA RICHCREEK, Plaintiff, No. C 07-05730 WHA FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:07-cv-05730-WHA

Document 10

Filed 02/21/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. 4.

request for discovery shall be filed THREE WEEKS before the hearing with any reply thereto TWO WEEKS before the hearing. Reply declarations will be disfavored. Depending on the outcome of the summary-judgment motion, this case may or may not proceed further. If it does, a further case management order will issue. A further case management conference is set for JUNE 12, 2008, at 11:00 A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2008.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2