Free Motion to Seal - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA

Document 160

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 3 Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 4 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Email: [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Attorneys for RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC., 12 13 vs. Counterclaimant, CASE NO. C 07-4161 WHA RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(D) TO FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS DESIGNATED BY QUANTUM CORPORATION AS CONFIDENTIAL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 QUANTUM CORPORATION, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51198/2561195.1 Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

Counterdefendant. QUANTUM CORPORATION, Counterclaimant, vs. RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC., Counterdefendant.

-1-

RIVERBED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA

Document 160

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) and the Protective Order in this action, Riverbed

2 Technology, Inc. ("Riverbed") submits this request to file the following documents under seal. 3 Riverbed has no objection to filing these documents in the public record, but is filing these 4 documents under seal because Quantum Corporation ("Quantum") has designated these documents 5 or information contained in these documents confidential under the protective order that governs 6 this action. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 · Exhibits G and H to the Supplemental Declaration of Todd M. Briggs In Support Of Riverbed's Reply In Support Of Riverbed's Motion For Summary Judgment Of (1) Validity Of Claims 26 And 27 Of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, (2) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 103, And (3) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, And Opposition to Quantum Corporation's Motion for Leave To Amend Its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (containing information designated confidential by Quantum under the protective order). · Riverbed's Reply In Support Of Riverbed's Motion For Summary Judgment Of (1) Validity Of Claims 26 And 27 Of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, (2) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 103, And (3) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, And Opposition to Quantum Corporation's Motion for Leave To Amend Its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (containing information designated confidential by Quantum under the protective order).

17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51198/2561195.1 Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

July 2, 2008

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP /s/ Todd M. Briggs Todd M. Briggs Attorneys for RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.

-2-

RIVERBED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL