Free Response to Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 21.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 29, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 353 Words, 2,143 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8215/43.pdf

Download Response to Order - District Court of Delaware ( 21.3 kB)


Preview Response to Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00863-GMS

Document 43

Filed 02/29/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

JOHN GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALIE, Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------

) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 004-863 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DR. ALIE'S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (D.I. 39) Defendant Sitta Gombeh-Alie, M.D. ("Answering Defendant"), by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby responds to the Court's Order to Show Cause (D.I. 39) and states as follows: On February 19, 2008, this Court ordered Dr. Alie to show cause no later than March 3, 2008 why an entry of default should not be reinstated against her for failure to obtain representation and file an answer to the complaint (D.I. 39). The claims against Dr. Alie rise from a time when she was in the employ of First Correctional Medical ("FCM"). One of the benefits (and conditions) of that employment was that FCM provided insurance coverage for claims such as that made here by the Plaintiff. Unfortunately, after FCM went out of business, the fund it set aside to continue to cover such claims was exhausted. When she learned of the default, Dr. Alie sought

representation from FCM's former counsel, but was refused. Accordingly, she has had to find counsel who would agree to represent her at her own cost. On February 28, 2008, the undersigned counsel was retained to defend the above-captioned action.

Case 1:04-cv-00863-GMS

Document 43

Filed 02/29/2008

Page 2 of 2

Based on review of the facts alleged, and the applicable law, Dr. Alie has a meritorious defense to this action, and should be permitted the opportunity to present that defense so that she is not prejudiced by her former employer's failure to live up to its contractual promise. WHEREFORE, Dr. Alie respectfully requests the Court deem that she has shown cause why the entry of default should not be reinstated and allow her to defend this action on the merits

BALICK & BALICK, LLC

/s/ James E. Drnec James E. Drnec, Esquire (#3789) 711 King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302.658.4265 Attorneys for Defendant Date: February 29, 2008