Free Reply to Opposition - District Court of California - California

Case 5:07-cv-03783-JF

Document 41-2

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091) [email protected] AMY C. TOVAR (SBN 230370) [email protected] MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Attorneys for Defendants UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., and UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 STEPHANIE LENZ, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5417854.1

CASE NO. CV 07-03783 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed concurrently herewith]

UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., and UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP,

DATE: July 18, 2008 TIME: 9:00 a.m. CTRM: 3 (Honorable Jeremy Fogel)

SUPP. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE CASE NO. CV 07-03783

Case 5:07-cv-03783-JF

Document 41-2

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5417854.1

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendants Universal Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing, Inc. and Universal Music Publishing Group ("Universal") respectfully request that the Court take judicial notice of an April 17, 2007 letter from Viacom Deputy General Counsel Mark C. Morril to Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, available at http://www.eff.org/cases/moveon-brave-newfilms-v-viacom. A printout of the letter is attached as Exhibit A to this request. The letter is judicially noticeable under Federal Rule of Evidence 201, because it is "not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is . . . capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). The Court may take judicial notice of this matter without converting Universal's motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court, 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 (9th Cir. 1987); IntriPlex Technologies, Inc. v. Crest Group, Inc., 499 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007). DATED: July 3, 2008 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By:

/s/ Kelly M. Klaus KELLY M. KLAUS

Attorneys for Defendants UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC., and UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP

-1-

SUPP. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE CASE NO. CV 07-03783

Case 5:07-cv-03783-JF

Document 41-2

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 3 of 4

Case 5:07-cv-03783-JF

Document 41-2

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 4 of 4