Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 37.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: June 2, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 452 Words, 2,847 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196245/27.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 37.2 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cr-00612-JF

Document 27

Filed 06/02/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division CHAD M. MANDELL (ILBN 6286783) Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Boulevard San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5059 Facsimile: (408) 535-5066 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for the United States of America

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 The parties stipulate that the time between May 28, 2008 and June 12, 2008 is excluded under 22 the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161, and agree that the failure to grant the requested 23 continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective 24 preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Finally, the parties agree that the 25 ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the 26 public, and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. 27 28 // 1 v. ABEL LAMAS-PACHECO, Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CR 07-00612 JF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM MAY 28, 2008 TO JUNE 12, 2008 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

Case 5:07-cr-00612-JF

Document 27

Filed 06/02/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).

DATED: May 29, 2008

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney __/s/___________________________________ CHAD M. MANDELL Special Assistant United States Attorney

___/s/__________________________________ LARA VINNARD Assistant Federal Public Defender

2

Case 5:07-cr-00612-JF

Document 27

Filed 06/02/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:

ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the time between May 28, 2008 and June 12, 2008 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161. The court finds that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Furthermore, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. The court therefore concludes that this exclusion of time should be made under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).

_______________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3