Case 4:07-cv-04925-CW
Document 32
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 DAVID S. CHANEY Chief Assistant Attorney General 3 ROCHELLE C. EAST Senior Assistant Attorney General 4 JONATHANL. WOLFF Supervising Deputy Attorney General 5 JOSE A. ZELIDON-ZEPEDA, State Bar No. 227108 Deputy Attorney General 6 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 7 Telephone: (415) 703-5781 Fax: (415) 703-5843 8 Email: [email protected] 9 Attorneys for Defendants J. Rodriguez, M. Kircher, J. Parra, D. Vega, and E. Camarena 10
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
THOMAS RAY WOODSON,
Plaintiff,
C 07-4925
v.
J. RODRIGUEZ, et at,
Defendants.
DEFENDANTS'STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Judge: The Honorable Claudia Wilken
On July 18, 2008, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time to respond to Defendants'
23 motion to dismiss. However, Plaintiff does not specify the length of the extension of time he 24 25 26
27
seeks to respond to the motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(b), Defendants inform the Court that Defendants have no objection to a 30-day extension oftime for Plaintiff to respond to the motion to dismiss. If the
1/ /
28 / / /
Defs.' Non-Opp. to PI.'s Request for EOT T. R. Woodson v. 1. Rodriguez, et aI. C 07-4925
1
Case 4:07-cv-04925-CW
Document 32
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 Court grants an extension oftime, however, Defendants request that the due date for Defendants' 2
3
reply also be re-set. Dated: August 22, 2008 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California DAVID S. CHANEY Chief Assistant Attorney General ROCHELLE C. EAST Senior Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN L. WOLFF Supervising Deputy Attorney General
4 \
5
6 7
8
9 10
11
12
13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
20134898.wpd SF2008200044
25
26 27 28
Defs.' Non-Opp, to Pl.'s Request for EOT T. R. Woodson v. J. Rodriguez, et ai. C 07-4925
2
Case 4:07-cv-04925-CW
Document 32
Filed 08/25/2008
Page 3 of 3
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL
Case Name: Case No.: I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office ofthe Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business.
\
T. R. Woodson v. J. Rodriguez, et al. C 07-4925
On August 25, 2008, I served the attached
DEFENDANTS'ยท STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TiME1TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO . DISMISS
by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the AttornbY General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004, addressed as follows: Thomas R. Woodson P-76095 Calipatria State Prison P.O. Box 5001 Calipatria, CA 92233-5001 Pro Per
i declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true
and correct and that this declaration was executed on August 25, 2008, at San Francisco, California. M. Xiang Declarant
20135337.wpd
Signature