Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 44.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 15, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 394 Words, 2,279 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8180/33.pdf

Download Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware ( 44.8 kB)


Preview Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00828-JJF Document 33 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
CAROLE HOLICK,
Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION
v.
DAVID OPPENHEIMER AND NO. 04-0828 (JJF)
COMPANY
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a
THE OPPENHEIMER GROUP,
a Washington limited partnership,
Defendant.
FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
WHEREAS, the parties have requested that this matter be referred to the Magistrate
Judge for mediation;
WHEREAS, by Order dated July 25, 2005, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate
Judge Thynge for the purposes of exploring the possibility of a settlement (D.1. 23); and
WHEREAS, the parties have requested the Court to amend the Joint Proposed Rule 16
Scheduling Order approved by the Court on February 8, 2005 ("Scheduling Order"), so as to
defer the close of fact discovery and related deadlines until after the conclusion of mediation.
IT IS THEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
1. The Scheduling Order is hereby amended as follows:
a. All fact discovery shall be completed within thirty (30) days following the
conclusion of mediation. ‘
b. Reports from retained experts required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) are due
from the plaintiff within thirty (30) days after the close of fact discovery and from the defendant
within thirty (30) days thereafter.
WlL:$3399.l}davIS9-2242I6

Case 1:04-cv-00828-JJF Document 33 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 2 of 2
c. Any case dispositive motion shall be served and filed on or before forty-
five (45) days after the close of fact discovery. No case dispositive motion may be filed more
than ten (10) days from the above without leave of the Court.
d. The Pretrial Conference scheduled for January 19, 2006, shall be
continued until a date and time to be determined by the Court if the matter is not resolved by the
mediation. In that event, the parties shall promptly notify the Court of the conclusion of the
mediation and request a new date and time for the Pretrial Conference.
2. In all other respects, the Scheduling Order shall remain in full force and effect.
DATE ED S l AT‘ESj ISTRICT JUD {Q.}
WlL:5J399.l/davl59-2242l6 · 2 ·

Case 1:04-cv-00828-JJF

Document 33

Filed 08/10/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00828-JJF

Document 33

Filed 08/10/2005

Page 2 of 2