Free Motion to Preclude - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-0O582—G|\/IS Document 55-2 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
INACOM CORP., et al.
Plaintiffs
v. Civil Action N0. 04-CV-582 (GMS)
DELL COMPUTER CORP.
Defendant
INACOM CORP., et al.
Plaintiffs
v. Civil Action N0. 04-CV-583 (GMS)
LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant
INACOM CORP., etal.
Plaintiffs
v. Civil Action No. 04-CV-593 (GMS)
INGRAM ENTERTAINMENT INC.
Defendant
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
THE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND REPORT OF STUART A. GOLLIN
s1.1 s64s2sv1/0049ov.c000s

Case 1:04-cv-0O582—G|\/IS Document 55-2 Filed 08/15/2005 Page 2 of 2
Upon the application of Defendants Dell Computer Corp. (“Dell"), Lexmark
International, Inc. (“Lexmark") and Ingram Entertainment Inc. ("Ingram") (collectively
"Defendants") to exclude the expert testimony and report of Stuart A. Gollin and the Court being
duly and sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the expert testimony and report of Stuart A. Gollin is excluded
from and will not be admitted at trial because they are not sufficiently reliable and relevant to
satisfy the standards of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as made applicable to non-scientific expert testimony by Kumho Tire
Company v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
Dated: , 2005.

United States District Court
District of Delaware
2
st.1 564523vl/OO4907.00003

Case 1:04-cv-00582-GMS

Document 55-2

Filed 08/15/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00582-GMS

Document 55-2

Filed 08/15/2005

Page 2 of 2