Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 21.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 25, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 413 Words, 2,632 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193999/9.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 21.1 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cr-00452-JL

Document 9

Filed 07/25/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990) United States Attorney W. DOUGLAS SPRAGUE (CABN 202121) Acting Chief, Criminal Division WENDY THOMAS (NYBN 4315420) Special Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6809 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties appeared before the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas on July 18, 2007. With the agreement of counsel for both parties, the Court found and held as follows: 1. The parties agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1), and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 from July 18, 2007 to July 30, 2007, in light of the need for effective preparation of counsel. Failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence and the need for counsel to review the [PROPOSED[ ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME v. JESUS VELEZ, a/k/a Alfredo Guillen ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. CR 07-0452 MAG

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME FROM JULY 18, 2007, TO JULY 30, 2007

CR 07-0452 MAG

Case 3:07-cr-00452-JL

Document 9

Filed 07/25/2007

Page 2 of 2

government's discovery and proposed plea agreement with the defendant, and would 1 unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel. 2 2. Given these circumstances, the Court found that the ends of justice served by 3 excluding the period from July 18, 2007 to July 30, 2007 outweigh the best interest of the public 4 and the defendant in a speedy trial. Id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 5 3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court ordered that the period 6 from July 18, 2007 to July 30, 2007 be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 7 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED[ ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:7/18/2007 _/s/_______________________________ WENDY THOMAS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney DATED:7/18/2007 _/s/_______________________________ JOSH COHEN Counsel for Jesus Velez

7/24/07 DATED:_______________

________________________________ THE HON. NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

CR 07-0452 MAG

2