Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-03627-MMC

Document 3-3

Filed 01/22/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MALIK ALI MUHAMMAD, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 16 17 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent shall file with this [PROPOSED] ORDER C 07-3627 MMC (PR) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18 Court and serve upon petitioner, on or before March 24, 2008, an answer or other responsive 19 pleading to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. If respondent files an answer and petitioner 20 wishes to respond, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on respondent 21 within 30 days of his receipt of the answer. If respondent files a motion to dismiss and petitioner 22 wishes to respond, he shall do so by filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition with the 23 Court and serving it on respondent within 30 days of his receipt of the motion. If respondent 24 wishes to reply to the opposition, he shall do so by filing a reply with the Court and serving it on 25 petitioner within 15 days of his receipt of the opposition. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
Muhammad v. Adams, Warden Case No. C 07-3627 MMC (PR)

27 Dated: __________________________ 28
[Proposed] Order