Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 95.6 kB
Pages: 5
Date: September 24, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 996 Words, 6,223 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193207/11.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 95.6 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-03220-SC

Document 11

Filed 09/25/2007

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

LUCAS VALLEY LAW MARK K. de LANGIS (SBN 190083) 2110 Elderberry Lane San Rafael, California 94903 Telephone: (415) 472-3892 Facsimile: (415) 472-3977 [email protected] Attorneys for Petitioners AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of the Arbitration between AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD. Petitioners, v. D.S.R. SHIPPING CO., INC., a corporation, Respondent.

No. C 07-03220 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR [9 U.S.C. section 9]

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR

Case 3:07-cv-03220-SC

Document 11

Filed 09/25/2007

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 D.S.R. SHIPPING CO., INC., a corporation, Respondent. v. In the Matter of the Arbitration between AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD. Petitioners, No. C 07-03220 SC ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR [9 U.S.C. section 9] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR

Case 3:07-cv-03220-SC

Document 11

Filed 09/25/2007

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Petitioners AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD. bring this action and the present motion to confirm an arbitration award in their favor against respondent D.S.R. Shipping Co., Inc. ("D.S.R."). Respondent has not made a formal appearance in this action and has not filed an opposition to the motion to confirm currently before the Court. The Court conducted a hearing on Petitioners' motion to confirm the award on November 16, 2007; again Respondent did not make an appearance. After careful consideration of the papers filed by the Petitioners and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Petitioners' motion to confirm the arbitration award. BACKGROUND On or about June 18, 2002, APL Co. Pte., Ltd., in its individual capacity and as an agent for American President Lines, Ltd., entered into a written maritime contract with D.S.R. The contract provided for Petitioners to ship Respondent's cargo by sea from the United States to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. The contract further memorialized the parties' agreement that any "dispute arising out of or in connection with this Contract" shall be submitted to arbitration in San Francisco, California, before an arbitrator of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). (Petition to Confirm, Exh. A at Section 4.) The arbitration provision stated that the decision of the arbitrator "shall be final, binding and not subject to further review." (Id.) Finally, the provision provided for enforcement of any arbitration decision "by any court, tribunal, or other forum as may properly assert jurisdiction" and the parties expressly agreed "that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has personal jurisdiction." (Id.) On January 19, 2004, APL invoiced D.S.R. the sum of $14,700, which was then and still is due under the terms of the June 2002 contract. APL initiated arbitration proceedings to collect the outstanding monies owed, and on April 4, 2007, the matter was submitted to AAA panelist Richard J. Collier, Esq. D.S.R. did not submit any documents for the arbitrator's consideration. On April 18, 2007, Mr. Collier awarded APL the principal amount due of $14,700, attorneys'

3
ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR

Case 3:07-cv-03220-SC

Document 11

Filed 09/25/2007

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

fees of $2,340 and costs of $1,900, for a total award of $18,940 (the "Award"). (Petition to Confirm, Exh. C.) Petitioners now move to confirm the Award under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. section 9. DISCUSSION As a preliminary matter, the existence of this Court's jurisdiction is not in dispute. The United States Supreme Court has held that the FAA does not provide a separate basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Rather, there must exist other independent grounds for federal jurisdiction. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 25 n.32 (1983). Here, Petitioners invoke original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. section 1333. Upon review of the underlying maritime contract, the Court agrees that federal admiralty and maritime jurisdiction exists. The FAA, 9 U.S.C. section 9, provides that any party to an arbitration award may apply to the court for an order confirming the award if the parties have previously agreed to such action. Section 9 mandates that the court must grant the order confirming the award unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as directed by Sections 10 or 11 of the FAA. As discussed above, the June 2002 Contract between the parties provides that any arbitration award may be enforced by any court, tribunal, or other forum as may properly assert jurisdiction. There is no dispute regarding this Court's jurisdiction. Respondent has not made an appearance in this matter, nor presented any argument that the Award should be vacated, modified, or corrected. Following careful review of the papers presented in support of Petitioners' motion and the underlying Award issued on April 18, 2007, pursuant to the terms of the parties written contract, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Award attached as Exh. C to the Petition for Order Confirming Award of Arbitrator is CONFIRMED.

4
ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR

Case 3:07-cv-03220-SC

Document 11

Filed 09/25/2007

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: _______________, 2007 IT IS SO ORDERED.

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Petitioners' Motion to Confirm Award of Arbitrator is GRANTED and the Award of $18,940 is confirmed. APL is also entitled to its $350 costs of suit herein. The Court will enter judgment in the amount of $19,290.

By: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
ORDER CONFIRMING AWARD OF ARBITRATOR