Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 24.7 kB
Pages: 4
Date: May 28, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,025 Words, 6,476 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193087/20.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 24.7 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-03093-HRL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.; LAFACE RECORDS LLC; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; and CAPITOL RECORDS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; LAFACE RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; and CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v.

CASE NO. C 07-03093 HRL Honorable Howard R. Lloyd [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION BASED ON STIPULATION

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[Proposed] Judgment and Permanent Injunction Case No. C 07-03093 HRL
#37921 v1

DEVANEI UNIQUE HAMPTON, Defendant.

Case 5:07-cv-03093-HRL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Judgment and Permanent Injunction executed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. $10,448.50. 2. Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs' costs of suit (complaint filing fee and service of Defendant shall pay to Plaintiffs in settlement of this action the total sum of

process fee) in the amount of $551.50. 3. Defendant shall be and hereby is enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing

Plaintiffs' rights under federal or state law in any sound recording, whether now in existence or later created, that is owned or controlled by Plaintiffs (or any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate record label of Plaintiffs) ("Plaintiffs' Recordings"), including without limitation by: a) using the Internet or any online media distribution system to reproduce (i.e.,

download) any of Plaintiffs' Recordings, to distribute (i.e., upload) any of Plaintiffs' Recordings, or to make any of Plaintiffs' Recordings available for distribution to the public, except pursuant to a lawful license or with the express authority of Plaintiffs; or b) causing, authorizing, permitting, or facilitating any third party to access the

Internet or any online media distribution system through the use of an Internet connection and/or computer equipment owned or controlled by Defendant, to reproduce (i.e., download) any of Plaintiffs' Recordings, to distribute (i.e., upload) any of Plaintiffs' Recordings, or to make any of Plaintiffs' Recordings available for distribution to the public, except pursuant to a lawful license or with the express authority of Plaintiffs. Defendant also shall destroy all copies of Plaintiffs' Recordings that Defendant and/or any third party that has used the Internet connection and/or computer equipment owned or controlled by Defendant has downloaded without Plaintiffs' authorization onto any computer hard drive or server owned or controlled by Defendant, and shall destroy all copies of those downloaded recordings transferred onto any physical medium or device in Defendant's possession, custody, or control.
1 [Proposed] Judgment and Permanent Injunction Case No. C 07-03093 HRL
#37921 v1

Case 5:07-cv-03093-HRL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4.

Defendant irrevocably and fully waives notice of entry of the Judgment and

Permanent Injunction, and understands and agrees that violation of the Judgment and Permanent Injunction will expose Defendant to all penalties provided by law, including for contempt of Court. 5. Defendant irrevocably and fully waives any and all right to appeal this Judgment and

Permanent Injunction, to have it vacated or set aside, to seek or obtain a new trial thereon, or otherwise to attack in any way, directly or collaterally, its validity or enforceability. 6. Nothing contained in the Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall limit the right of

Plaintiffs to recover damages for any and all infringements by Defendant of any right under federal copyright law or state law occurring after the date Defendant executes the Stipulation to Judgment and Permanent Injunction. 7. The Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of

enforcing this final Judgment and Permanent Injunction.

Dated: ______________

By: ________________________________ Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

2 [Proposed] Judgment and Permanent Injunction Case No. C 07-03093 HRL
#37921 v1

Case 5:07-cv-03093-HRL

Document 20

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO I am employed in the office of Holme Roberts & Owen in San Francisco, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. On May 28, 2008, I served the foregoing documents described as: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION BASED ON STIPULATION on the interested party in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: David I. Kelvin 1516 Oak Street, Ste. 316 Alameda, CA 94501 Attorney for Defendant Mark Lucia U.C. Berkeley 102 Sproul Hall Berkeley, CA 94720 Attorney for Defendant

BY MAIL: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on May 28, 2008 at San Francisco, California.

Della Grant

1
Proof of Service Case No. C 07-03093 HRL
#37921 v1