Free Order on Motion for Certificate of Appealability - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.2 kB
Pages: 1
Date: November 8, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 271 Words, 1,639 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193074/8-1.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Certificate of Appealability - District Court of California ( 19.2 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Certificate of Appealability - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-03139-MJJ

Document 8

Filed 11/08/2007

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
G:\PRO-SE\MJJ\HC.07\seegars.dsm.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES SEEGARS, Petitioner, v. SUZAN HUBBARD, Respondent. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 07-3139 MJJ (PR)

ORDER OF DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (Docket No. 7)

Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition was dismissed, and petitioner has filed a notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). Petitioner has not shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Accordingly, the request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall forward this order, along with the case file, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from which petitioner also may seek a certificate of appealability. See Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. This order terminates Docket No. 7.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 11/07/07 MARTIN J. JENKINS United States District Judge