Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 60.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 386 Words, 2,514 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/193052/45.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 60.3 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
ase 3:O7—cv-03114-SI Document 45 Filed O9/O5/2008 Page 1 of 2
1 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Dana L. Peterson (SBN 178499) [email protected]
2 Jonathan D. Martin (SBN 188744)[email protected]
Andrew M. McNaught (SBN 209093) [email protected]
3 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, California 94105
4 Telephone; (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 KAISER FOUNDATION HEAljl`H PLAN, INC.
7
8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 FERNANDO DAROSA, ) Case No. C07-03114 Sl
)
12 Plaintiff, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
13 v. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE
) ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
14 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, ) Al)JUDICATION
INC )
15 ) Date: October3l, 2008
Defendant. ) Time: 9:00 AM
16 ) Location: Courtroom 10, 19th Floor
) Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston
17 )
_-,-LL,, ,,,_, LL,-_,,_._Lr ,,,,
18
19 Defendant KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC.’s ("Defendant") Motion for
QQ Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication came on regularly for hearing
2] before this Court on October 31, 2008. All parties were given notice and an opportunity to be
22 heard, and each party was represented at the hearing by its counsel of record. The Court, having
Q3 reviewed all ofthe papers and evidence tiled in support of and in opposition to the motion, and
24 having heard oral argument, rules as follows:
25 For the reasons stated in Defendant’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and based
Q6 on the authority cited therein, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.
27 The Court linds no genuine disputed issues of material fact and determines that Plaintiffs claims
28
TPROPOSEDil§DEKiiC,¢[email protected]

ase 3:O7—cv-03114-SI Document 45 Filed O9/O5/2008 Page 2 of 2
1 are without merit. Accordingly, Plaintiff s lawsuit is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. The
2 Clerk is ordered to close the tile, and costs are awarded to Defendant.
3 IT 1S SO ORDERED.
4
Dated:
5 —“*‘”“—7`”—"
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16 7
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 sm 283335I81
as ,,,_,, D,,,_,_D_sD_2-_m__1,,_ _,,1 Du ,,,,,, __1W_,,_D,,_3 ,,,, _-__,.,____~_*,__,-*-,.*,1*.2__,__1
[PROPOSED] ORDER —a—— CASE NO. CO7-O31 14 S1

Case 3:07-cv-03114-SI

Document 45

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-03114-SI

Document 45

Filed 09/05/2008

Page 2 of 2