Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California


File Size: 44.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 510 Words, 3,267 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192903/77-36.pdf

Download Declaration in Support - District Court of California ( 44.0 kB)


Preview Declaration in Support - District Court of California
Case 4:O7—cv—O2684-CW Document 77-36 Filed O7/24/2008 Page 1 0f2

Case 4:O7—cv—O2684-CW Document 77-36 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 2 of 2
—, Patrice.G.Mcintyre@m Tot Mon¤[email protected]
,_·•I'·‘ ..Cr arsh.com cc;
‘ Subject; COPART #2441886561
· ;$u?' OWOWXm61025AM
‘ K
Hi Monica,
we have recently completed a review of the subject policy and noted the
following items in need of correction or clarification. _
Agreed Value should apply for all Property and Business Income - RY, l· :*`:‘ Y·\
coverages. The Agreed Value boxes should be checked for this on the .._r.,-
supplemental declarations form FM600.0.96O [0494] .;;.._...-».*i
V_y~_ The 'Newly Acquired or Constructed’ limits in Form CP00l0 should be
Q `i·‘ T increased to the following, and the Period of Coverage for same should i
y` be 180 Days; Buildings $1,000,000; BPP $500,000. Also 180 Days
` - provision for 'Newly Acquired/Construced‘ under the BI Form CP0030
·y`\ The Ordinance or Law sublimit on FM206.05 is stated as $1,000,000, but fr ,.i— .i
the coverage form CP0405 says $2,500,000. I think this means $1,000,000 , Z _r
limit applies to Coverage A, and $2,500,000 combined limit applies to ”‘ ` V 1
Coverages BLC, but please confirm ‘M,' YLLT ‘Lr l
. .'¤>-T`-;"-
The Protective Safeguards provision was not included in your proposal, - T., J,
can you remove this ,2-L; ~l`-: ? ‘-..= l'l_'j ·‘;; .1;;;,-__»,.*g,_; l _ r-
Re: Property Form CPOOIO, Page 2. Property Not Covered. Para c.
- "Automobiles held for Sale" — This exclusion should be deleted. This
is Copart's principal operation. Although the inventory coverage was
· removed for the most part, with effect on 1/1/06, applicable sublimits , ,
remain for offsite locations and owned autos held for sale. ¤,,L 7j;, I g_ .... _.;Y
;~,_\ i.·l;..:.·’. g.;-·; Q ` , _ \ _-. ~_ · .»`*-·l»_'·,=_ .‘{·· .;`.·`.
The electrical and mechanical breakdown exclusions should be deleted in i ·. .;,—_J
respect to EDP. V _ Z
_ _-, · ae
Do not see the ‘coverage' language for a number of the sub—limited ~
coverages as listed on endorsement FM206.0.5 (1199), i.e. Accounts
Receivable, Leasehold Interest, Off Premises Power, Transit, etc.. _
There used to be an enhancement endorsement that included some of these
but don't see that .rji· K. 2 .»;J_y M.,_ Q ·.:"
The Flood coverage is included by attachment of a form/endorsement that
is different from last year. Exclusions g. and m. of the Property
Coverage Form CP0010 were previously removed and I don't see this
accomplished with the new Flood Endt. - “.;;,q_ _ X r, jg _. . .‘ _
Thanks, and please let me know if any questions.
Patrice McIntyre
Marsh Risk & Insurance Services
Three Embarcadero Center, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415-74]-8617
Fax; 415-743-8055
[email protected] -
UW(05-06) 060

Case 4:07-cv-02684-CW

Document 77-36

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 4:07-cv-02684-CW

Document 77-36

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 2 of 2