Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 60.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 31, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 334 Words, 2,122 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192444/14.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 60.5 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL Document 14 Filed 05/31 /2007 Page 1 of 2
1 HARVEY SISKIND LLP
D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712)
2 e-mail: pharvey@harveysisl 3 SETH I. APPEL (SBN 233421)
e-mail: sappel@harveysis1 4 Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
5 Telephone: (415) 354-0100
6 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124
7 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
SEOK KI KIM and STV ASIA, LTD.
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
it FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION V
12
FRANK NEMIROFSKY, Case N0.: C 07 2769 JL
13
plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
14 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO VACATE OR
V- MODIFY TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE
15 . . onnmzs 1
SEOK KI KIM; STV ASIA, LTD., a British
16 Virgin Islands corporation; and DOES 1
17 through 20, inclusive,
1 8 Defendants.
19 SEOK KI KIM and STV ASIA, LTD., a
British Virgin Islands corporation,
20 _
Counterclaimants,
21
v.
22
FRANK NEMIROFSKY,
23 .
Counterdefendant.
24
25
26 The Motion TO Vacate or Modify Temporary Protective Orders of Defendants/Counterclaimants
27 Seok Ki Kim and STV Asia, Ltd. came before this Court on June _, 2007, at .
-1-
28 [PROPOSED] oRDER GMNTING Mo`T1oN TO vAcATE on Momrv rEMPoRARY PRoTEcT1vE ORDERS
Case No.: C 07 2769 JL

Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL Document 14 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
1 Satisfactory proof having been received and good cause appearing therefor:
2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the temporary protective orders ("TPOs) issued by the San
3 Francisco Superior Court on May 16, 2007 are vacated.
4 PIaintiff/Counterdefendant Frank Neniirofsky ("Plaintiff") is unlikely to prevail on any of his
5 relevant causes of action. Moreover, Plaintiff cannot establish great or irreparable injury.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED:
8
9
10 United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 -
18
19
20
21
22
23 ‘
24
25
26
27
-2-
28 6`sE ‘F€
Case No.: C 07 2769 JL

Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL

Document 14

Filed 05/31/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL

Document 14

Filed 05/31/2007

Page 2 of 2