Free Order on Motion to Seal Document - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 92

Filed 02/07/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HARVEY SISKIND LLP IAN K. BOYD (State Bar No. 191434) [email protected] SETH I. APPEL (State Bar No. 233421) [email protected] RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN (State Bar No. 236388) [email protected] Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C 07-02748 MHP MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS Plaintiff, v. ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG Defendants. ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG, Counterclaimants, v. MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS, and DOES 110, Counterdefendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNREDACTED DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL RE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE ADJUDGED IN CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONED

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. C 07-02748 MHP

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 92

Filed 02/07/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This matter came on for determination before the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, on February __, 2008, upon the administrative motion of Plaintiff Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts ("Plaintiff") for an order authorizing the filing of an unredacted Application for an Order to Show Cause as to Why Defendants Should Not Be Adjudged in Contempt ("Application"), an unredacted declaration ("Declaration") of one of Plaintiff's customers, and unredacted e-mails ("E-mails) attached as an exhibit to the Declaration of Seth I. Appel. The Court finds that good cause exists for the redacted information to be filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5. For good cause therefor appearing, it is ORDERED as follows: The unredacted versions of the Application, Declaration and E-mails shall be filed under seal. Plaintiff shall also file on the public docket a redacted version of the Application, Declaration, and Emails, which shall only redact the names and employers of the four customers at issue.

2/6/2008 DATED: ____________________

UNIT ED

__________________________________ The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel D D United States DistrictERE Judge SO OR Court
arilyn H Judge M . Patel

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

­1­ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. C 07-02748 MHP

A

C

LI

FO

R NIA

IT IS

NO

RT

H