Free Affidavit - District Court of California - California


File Size: 110.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 893 Words, 5,385 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192406/108.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of California ( 110.2 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv—02748—I\/IHP Document 108 Filed O2/15/2008 Page 1 of 3
l CHANDLER, WOOD, HARRINGTON & MAFFLY
RICHARD HARRINGTON (Bar #28099)
2 One Maritime Plaza, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 9411.1
3 Telephene: (4l5) 421-5484
Facsimile: (415) 986-4874
4
SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
5 ROBERT CHARLES WA@ (Ba1·#160824)
One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor
6 San Francisco, CA 941 li
T elephonc: (415) 42 I -6500
7 Facsimile: (4l 5) 421-2922
Ernaii: [email protected]
8
Attorneys for Defendants and Cotmterclaimants
9 ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG I
` l0
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I: li
E 5 x§ NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ZESO 12
gi SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
a§e8 is
maze
Egg? 14
§ MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE I Case No. C 07-02748
°° G E 15 MARKETING CONCEPTS,
PROOF OF SERVICE
16 Plaintiff,
Date: March 3, 2008
i7 v. Time: 2:00 pm.
Dept: 15, Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel
E8 ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA
CI-IANG,
E9
Defendants.
20 _______MM,_
21 ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA
CHANG,
22
Counter-Claimants,
23
‘ v. I
24 ,
MARK LIEILGE cl/b/a CREATIVE I
25 MARKETING CONCEPTS, and DOES l — 1 I
10, i
A 26 i
l Cou11ter—Defeadants. I
27 _
28 .
s
- 1 , E
Case No. MMT PROOF OF SREVICE __ [
C- 07-02748

Case 3:07-cv—O2748—I\/IHP Document 108 Filed O2/15/2008 Page 2 of 3
l I, Janis I,. Ing, declare:
2 I. I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California by Shartsis
Friese LLP at One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor, San Francisco, California 94l l l.
3
2. I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the within cause.
4
3. I am readily familiar with Shartsis Friese LLP’s practice for collection and
5 processing of correspondence and documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service,
which in the normal course of business provides for the deposit of all correspondence and
6 documents with the United States Postal Service on the sarne day they are collected and processed
for mailing.
'7
4. On February I5, 2008, at Shaitsis Friese LLP located at the aboveweferenced
8 address, I served the following: (I) EXHIBIT B TO DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY
SCHMOLDER IN OPPOSITION T O APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
9 RE: CONTEMPT; (2) EXHIBIT D TO DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY SCHMOLDER
IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
10 CONTEMPT; (3) EXHIBIT E TO DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY SCHMOLDER IN
OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONT EMPT ;
- ll (4) EXHIBIT F TO DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY SCHIVIOLDER IN OPPOSITION TO
2 fi ad APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEIVIPT; (5) EXHIBIT G TO
12 DECLARATION OF TIMOTI-IY SCHMOLDER IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION
tr *1 FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT; (6) EXHIBIT H TO
,_‘:§§g§ 13 DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY SCHMOLDER IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION
gg g FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT; and (7) EXHIBIT I TO
; i I4 DECLARATION OF TIMOTHY SCHMOLDER IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION
FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT on the interested parties in said cause by
‘ g I5
_g<__ personal delivery by messenger service ofthe document(s) above to the person(s) at the
16 address(es) set forth below:
, 17 WW placing the docurnent(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid,
in accordance with the iirm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailin
18 to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth helow:
www facsimile transmission pursuant to Rule 2008 ofthe California Rules of Court on this date ,
I9 betore 5:00 p.n1. (PST) of the docurnent(s) listed above from sending facsimile machine main l
telephone number (4l 5) 42l—2922, and which transmission was reported as complete and i
20 without error (copy ol` which is attached), to facsimile nurnher(s) set forth below:
i 2} M_______ consigning the docunient(s) listed above to an express delivery service for guaranteed deliver
on the next business day to the _person(s) at the address(es) set forth below:
22 ____ electronically delivering the document(s) listed above pursuant to federal and local rules of th
court on this date tirom electronic address sflawcom, and which transmission was reported as
23 complete and without error, to electronic mail address(es) set forth below: l
24
25 I I i
26 I
27
28 I l
- 2 - __-
Case No. PROOF Oli SREVICE l
C 07-02748 l

Case 3:07-cv—02748—I\/IHP Document 108 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 3 of 3
I Ian K. Boyd, Esq.
Seth E. Appel, Esq.
2 Harvey Siskind LLP
3 Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
4 email: iboyd@harveyrsisl sappcl@harveysisl -
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
6
Executed on February 15, 2008, in San Francisco, California.
7 t .
rfaaueaer
8 | Jams L. In
9 7475\00l\llNG\l492949.I
10
Z l l
$ۤi i2 r
Ear;
agar
LZ E E <. 14
aaai
”° O §, 15
I6 ·
17
l8
l9
2.0
2l
22 -
23 .
24
‘ 25
26
27
28

{3656 N0- PROOF OF SREVECE
C 07-02748

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 108

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 108

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 108

Filed 02/15/2008

Page 3 of 3