Free Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02732-SC Document 8 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TREVOR MOSS, V
CASE NO_ C 07 2732
P1aintiff(s),
v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
r1BERoN MINERALS LTD., ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s).
y
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: I ‘
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
,/ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must particqyate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identyjz process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
/ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) `
other requested deadline
Dated; 8/13/07 /s/ James M. Hanavan
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 8/13/07 _/s/ David J. Brown _
t Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:07-cv-02732-SC Document 8 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
‘ [PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR _
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of this order. .
other _
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-02732-SC

Document 8

Filed 08/15/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-02732-SC

Document 8

Filed 08/15/2007

Page 2 of 2