Free ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 332.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 902 Words, 5,350 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 791 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192335/3-2.pdf

Download ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California ( 332.4 kB)


Preview ADR Scheduling Order - District Court of California
_ { Case 5:07-cv-02710-JF Document 3-2 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 3
· ll l
l
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E é 2
2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 SAN JOSE DIVISION _11__11_ j_ j ZQQZ
5 Case N0- .....-.............— ta w. wttetttwé
6 .
STANDING ORDER REGARDING
fg CASE MANAGEMENT IN CIVIL CASES
9 This order sets forth requirements for initial case management in all civil matters assigned to District
l0 Judges James Ware, Ronald M. Whyte and Jeremy Fogel, and Magistrate Judges Patricia V. Trumbull, Richard
l l Seeborg, and Howard R. Lloyd. All papers tiled must include the case number of the action followed by the
l2 initials ofthe assigned district judge or magistrate judge and, if applicable, the initials ofthe magistrate judge to
13 whom the action is referred for discovery or other pretrial activity.
14 Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Standing Order on all parties to this action and on all parties
l5 subsequently joined, in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and 5. Following service, plaintiff shall tile a certificate
16 of service in accordance with Civil L.R. 5-6(a).
17 All disclosure or discovery disputes in cases assigned to district judges are referred to the assigned
18 magistrate judge for determination pursuant to F ed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). Magistrate judges themselves handle
19 disclosure and discovery disputes in the cases assigned to them,
QQ Before selecting a hearing date for a motion before any of the judges of the San Jose Division, counsel
2l must confer with opposing counsel to determine that the proposed hearing date will not cause undue prejudice.
22 Civil motions under Civil L.R. 7-2 in cases assigned to Judge Ware may be noticed for hearing on any
23 Monday at 9:00 am.
24 Civil motions under Civil L.R. 7-2 in cases assigned to Judge Whyte may be noticed for hearing on any
25 Friday at 9:00 a.m.
26
U 27
28

U Case 5:07-cv-02710-JF Document 3-2 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 3
. ll l
1 Civil motions under Civil L.R. 7-2 in cases assigned to Judge Fogel may be noticed for hearing only
2 after contacting Judge Fogel’s judicial secretary, Teresa Fleishman, at 408-535-5426 and obtaining an available
3 date.
4 Civil motions under Civil LR. 7-2 in cases assigned to Magistrate Judge Trumbull may be noticed for
5 hearing on any Tuesday at 10:00 am.
6 Civil motions under Civil L.R. 7-2 in cases assigned to Magistrate Judge Seeborg may be noticed for
7 hearing on any Wednesday at 9:30 a.m.
8 Civil motions under Civil LR. 7-2 in cases assigned to Magistrate Judge Lloyd may be noticed for
9 hearing on any Tuesday at 10:00 a.m.
10 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 and 26 and Civil L.R. 16-l0(a), a Case Management Conference will be
1 1 held on at , at the United States Courthouse, 280
12 South First Street, San Jose, California. This conference may be continued only by court order pursuant to Civil
l3 L.R. 16·2(e). Parties may not stipulate to continue a Case Management Conference without court approval.
14 Pursuant to Civil LR. 16-3, in advance of the Case Management Conference, counsel shall confer with
15 their respective clients and opposing counsel for the purposes specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(t), Civil L.R. 16-8
16 and 16-9, and in patent cases, Patent L.R. 3.1 through 3.6. A meaningful meet and confer process prior to the
17 Case Management Conference and good faith compliance with the requirements of this Order are essential
18 elements of effective case management, Failure to meet and confer, to be prepared for the Case Management
19 Conference or to tile a Joint Case Management Conference Statement may result in sanctions. Parties may, but
20 are not required, to attend the Case Management Conference.
2] In all "E·iiling" cases when filing papers in connection with any motion for determination by a judge,
22 the parties Shall, in addition to tiling papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers by
23 the close ofthe next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be
24 marked "Cha1nbers Copy" and shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office, in an envelope clearly marked with the
25 judge’s name, case number and "E—filing Chambers Copy." Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document
26 with the Clerl<’s Office that has already been filed electronically.
27 IT IS SO ORDERED.
28 Dated; Effective on the date this order is filed, until further court order.
2

~ ~ Case 5:07-cv—02710-JF Document 3-2 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
· 1 '
1
2
es Ware
3 nited States Distnct Judge
4
5
/Zn4»#4m’ 7%. éézg
6 Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
7 .
Ԥ .
8 \ 1 J i
9 J
my F0; M
1() nited Stat Distnct Judge
1 1 S
12 Q ( * , A it
13 Patricia V. Tmmbull
United States Chief Magistrate Judge
14
et`4 ?
15
16
Richard Se g 1
17 United St es Mafgistrate Judge
i`\ 5
19
QQ H ard R. L1
U ted States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case 5:07-cv-02710-JF

Document 3-2

Filed 05/22/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 5:07-cv-02710-JF

Document 3-2

Filed 05/22/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 5:07-cv-02710-JF

Document 3-2

Filed 05/22/2007

Page 3 of 3