Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California - California


File Size: 11.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 334 Words, 2,290 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192230/45.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California ( 11.8 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02400-SI

Document 45

Filed 12/13/2007

Page 1 of 1

Defendants McGEORGE SCHOOL OF LAW and CALIFORNIA SPECIAL 1 EDUCATION HEARING OFFICE (SEHO) (collectively McGEORGE defendants) respectfully 2 3 plaintiffs' complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (FRCP 12(b)(6)). 4 5 6 7 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs assert generally that their action "arises out of contract violations that affect the submit the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of it's motion to dismiss

8 disabled minor children [plaintiffs] Mikey and Ryan," plaintiff Michael Petersen's children. 9 10 MCGEORGE defendants, asserts that McGeorge/SEHO was a private entity under contract with 11 12 the California Department of Education to provide hearing services and thus obligated by various (First Amended Complaint 6:18-26.)1 Plaintiffs' complaint, as it pertains specifically to the

13 unspecified state and federal laws to be free of discrimination toward special education students. 14 (First Amended Complaint 4:25-5:10; 6:27-7:5.) 15 16 17 carrying out its function as the California Special Education Hearing Office (SEHO), violated 18 19 one or more unspecified contractual obligations pertaining to the constitution, various civil rights Plaintiffs limit their claim against MCGEORGE defendants to their "Second Claim for Relief." In that claim, plaintiffs allege that the MCGEORGE defendants, in the course of

20 statues, and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). (First Amended Complaint 19:20-21:12.) 21 Plaintiffs' complaint, however, does not specify or refer to any particular contract

22 involving MCGEORGE defendants, and the complaint does not identify or articulate any state or 23 24 25 26 27 28
McGeorge defendants' copy of plaintiff's complaint does not include printed page numbers; thus, the page numbers referred to in this brief are based on counting plaintiff's caption page as page one, the next page as page two, and thereafter counting each page consecutively. 1 McGEORGE defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss, Case No. C07-02400 (SI)
1

federal contract "laws" or "provisions" that either govern such contracts or create for plaintiffs a private cause of action against MCGEORGE defendants.

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW