Free Order - District Court of California - California

_ _ Case 3:O7—cv-O2598—EI\/IC Document 11 Filed O7/O3/2007 Page 1 of 3
1 Eric G. Wallis (State Bar No. 67926)
E-mail: [email protected]
2 Mike C. Buckley (SBN 44919)
Email: [email protected] I
3 REED SMITH LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2400
4 Oakland, CA 94612-3572
5 Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 2084
6 Oakland, CA 94604-2084
7 Telephone: +1 510 763 2000
Facsimile: +1 510 273 8832 * < —.,,,,%
8 1 ‘ A
Christine A. Kendrick (State Bar No. 186002)
9 David R. Maurer (State Bar No. 216263)
E-mail; [email protected]
10 E-mail; [email protected]
§ MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
§ 11 INCORPORATED
E LEGAL COMPLIANCE DIVISION
§ 12 101 California Street, 2nd Floor
Q E San Francisco, CA 94111
I 13
§ g Telephone: +1 415 693 6000
Q gf 14 Facsimile; +1 415 693 6250
U-| 76
gg E 15 Attorneys for Defendant
E 16
E
2 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20 NATHALIE DECRET, an individual, No. C 07-2598 EMC
21 Plaintiif STIPULATION AND [P
ORDER COMPELLIN G ARBITRATION
22 vs. AND STAYIN G ACTION
23 MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
TNCORPORATED, a corporation, and DOES 1
24 through 20, inclusive,
25 Defendants.
26
27
28

STTPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER COMPELLING ARBITILATION AND STAYING ACTION
Decret v. Morgan Stanley — No. C 07-2598 EMC

_ 4 _ Case 3:O7—cv-O2598—EI\/IC Document 11 Filed O7/O3/2007 Page 2 of 3
1 WHEREAS, on April 5, 2007, an action was commenced in the Superior Court ofthe State
2 of Califomia in and for the City and County of San Francisco, entitled Nathalie Decret, an
3 individual v. Morgan Stanley & C0. Incorporated a corporation; and Does 1 through 20,
4 inclusive, as Case No. CGC—07-462078,
5 WHEREAS, on May 16, 2007, Morgan Stanley removed this case to the United States
6 District Court for the Northern District of California,
7 WHEREAS, a written agreement to arbitrate the claims asserted in this case exists between
3 Plaintiff and Defendant providing for arbitration of disputes between them under the auspices of
9 the National Association of Securities Dealers, [nc. (NASD) and its NASD Dispute Resolution,
0 10 Inc. subsidiary,
§ 11 NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that an Order may be entered by this Court: (1)
LL 1% 12 directing Plaintiff to submit her claims herein to arbitration before the NASD and its NASD
g 13 Dispute Resolution, Inc. subsidiary within thirty (30) days, and (2) staying this action pending
§J 14 conclusion of the arbitration or until further order of the Court. This stipulation and order are
g ig; 15 conditioned on the NASD Dispute Resolution (NASD-DR) accepting Plaintiffs arbitration filling,
g 16 as long as Plaintiff makes her tiling with the NASD-DR within 30 days of notice of this order
5 17 being served. If the arbitration filing is not accepted by the NASD-DR, Plaintiff may file notice
18 with this court, and the stay of this case shall be lifted.
19 DATED: June&Q, 2007.
20 REED SMITH LLP _ 2
21 ‘ 1’/M
22 By A Ai" i
E . Wallis `
23 Attorneys for Defendant
24 DATED: June L 2007.
25 Law Oftic Jeffrey Alan Feldman
26 [U /1 W
27 By effrey . Feldman
28 Attomeys for Plaintiff

sTI1>ULAT10N AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CCMPELLING ARBITRATION AND STAYING ACTION
Decret v. Morgan smmey — No. C 07-2598 EMC

_ Case 3:O7—cv-O2598—EI\/IC Document 11 Filed O7/O3/2007 Page 3 of 3
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS S 5 ’ I t U4- €»‘f""p“’°§` h 9'H hun
m‘§•:t .»·ZX"M{<;#?‘° I"•°*°"°é‘ L"7
2 UW 3 ’ '·"— MJ 1··1$·1·v.
Dated: june- 2007.
3 `
s District Court
4 we tete ~ ¥
5
EDWARD M. CHEN
6 UNITED sTAT1zs MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
0 10
§
§ 11
§ 12
5 E
Q 13
I; 1;
E E
S 14
¤J é
“ g 15
’ 16
E
" 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND STAYING ACTION
Dccrct v. Morgan Stanley — N0. C 07-2598 EMC .

Case 3:07-cv-02598-EMC

Document 11

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 3:07-cv-02598-EMC

Document 11

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 3:07-cv-02598-EMC

Document 11

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 3 of 3