Free Letter - District Court of California - California

I A Case 3:07-cv-02558-I\/IHP Document 14 Filed O3/10/2008 Page 1 of 2 9 A
]. RANDALL AN DRADA 1 BRENDAN KENNY A ` (510) 287-4168
(510) 287-4163 ALICIA KIINNON <8I¤> 287-4187
CATHERINE WHEELER (510) 2874165
TEL: (510) 287-4160 _ &; ANGELA STINCHFIELD (510) 2874170
FAX: _ (510) 287-4161 CHRISTINA VAN WERT (510) 287-2910
S O S AMELIA SANDOVAL (510) 287-2909
· ’ March 10, 2008 9 · ` . -
Honorable Martin]. lenkins
Courtroom 11, 19th Floor _ _ ' p
United States District Court ‘ . `
Northern District of California ·
i 450 Golden GateiAvenue » 9 l
San Francisco, CA 94102 ` A ‘ _
” Re: Harrison Rinehart v. Greg Ahern, et al. A .
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Calif. Case N o. CV 07-02558 Ml] (PR) _
I Our File No.: . RMS 0666 4 · j
E . Dear ludge lenkinsz '
Q - Plaintiff, an inmate in the Sant. Rita lail, filed this pro se civil rights complaint ` .
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that jail officials allowed him to be assaulted by E
( I » another inmate, resulting inserious injuries to plaintiff, in violation of the Eighth _ ·
V Amendment. _
‘ On luly 26, 2007, this Court issued an Order that directed defendants to file a
dispositive motion and provided that plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion for
summary judgment "shall be filed with the Court and served on defendants no later
than thirty (30) days from the defendants’ motion," pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 56. (
V l A Defendants Sheriff’s Technician Richardson and Sheriff Gregory Ahern filed a I
motion for sumimary judgment on October 24, 2007. The grounds for the motion were
that plaintiff could not establish deliberate indifferenceon part of Sheriff’s Technician '
Richardson and that Richardson was entitled to qualified immunity. .
i l PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION I
i 180 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 225, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612
F {000s4s00.ooc/}
i
I ` ’

{ p __ Q Case 3:07-cv-02558-I\/IHF; Document 14 Filed O3/10/2008 Page 2_ of 2 ,
l A 4
l Honorable Martin ]. ]en.l E March 10, 2008 ,_ ·
Page 2 . —
l
Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due on November 24, 2007. No -
I opposition was filed. ` °
Given plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition per the Court’s Order and FRCP 56,
I _ defendants respectfully request that this Court grant their motion for summary V
l - judgment and dismiss plaintiffs suit.
F l A · Very truly yours, · A
A _ . ANDRADA & Assocmrss
A ‘ BRENDAN KEN
BK:CVW/hs A A I J
’ cc: Harrison Rinehart ‘ . _ · A
1 2818 — 60*** Avenue I . i p l V
Oakland, CA 94605- V - ’ _ -
{00049962.Doc1} l
I - . .

Case 3:07-cv-02558-MHP

Document 14

Filed 03/10/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:07-cv-02558-MHP

Document 14

Filed 03/10/2008

Page 2 of 2