Free Order on Motion for Joinder - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02589-PJH

Document 7

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. MDL-02-01486 PJH
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________

C 06-04333 PJH

The State of California by its Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera and the Los Angeles Unified School District on Behalf of all other Politi et al v. Infineon Technologies AG et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________

C 06-06436 PJH

State of New York v. Micron Technology Inc. Et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________

C 07-01347 PJH

State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _________

C 07-02589 MEJ

The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. PJH

ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management -1-

Case 3:07-cv-02589-PJH

Document 7

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 2 of 3

conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

Dated:____5/24/07______ Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

-2-

Case 3:07-cv-02589-PJH

Document 7

Filed 05/25/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED:5/25/07

By: Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program:

(date)

-3-