Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD P O BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., S.B. #73685 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436 BRAYTON~PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 (415) 898-1247 (Fax No.) Attorneys for Plaintiff

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JAMES GUTHRIE, TONY DAVIDSON, RONALD ZERANGUE, SAMUEL RESTER, JOHN GRAY, ELMER PAROLINI, WAYNE DUFAULT, JESSE BEVERLY, JR., Plaintiffs, vs. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, and DOES 1-300, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C07-2542-SI JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINE AND CONFERENCE, AND TO EXTEND TIME; [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY; [PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE] ORDER TO CONTINUE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BRAYTON~PURCELL LLP

Pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-11 and 7-12, the following parties hereby stipulate to, and respectfully move the Court for, an Order staying deadlines, or in the alternative extending time, as set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3) and the Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31), for the following good cause: On June 11, 2007 with Document 10, June 11, 2007 with Document 14 and June 15, 2007 with Document 21, Defendants HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION F/K/A RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION and
K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

1

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 2 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, respectively, filed Notices to Tag Along Action regarding the pending Multidistrict Litigation ("MDL") in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, seeking among other things, to move Jurisdiction of this matter to that District. Said Defendants subsequently mailed notice to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. On June 11, 2007, Defendant HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION F/K/A RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY filed it declination to proceed before Magistrate Judge and request for reassignment to a District Court Judge (Document 8). On June 13, 2007, the Reassignment Order (Document 17) assigned this matter to the Honorable Susan Illston and ordered that "all matters presently scheduled for hearing are vacated and should be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned." On June 21, 2007, the Notice (Document 31) set the initial case management conference for Friday, September 21, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. It appears to the parties that neither the Reassignment Order of June 13, 2007 (Document 17) nor the Notice of June 21, 2007 (Document 31) disturbed the deadlines by the May 14, 2007 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (Document 3), except, of course, moving the CMC Conference date. On June 19, 2007 Defendant HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION F/K/A RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY filed its Defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation f/k/a Raytheon Aircraft Company's Notice of and Motion to Sever Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.21 (Document 27), currently set for hearing on August 17, 2007. On July 29, 1991, the JPML entered an order transferring all asbestos personal injury cases pending in the federal courts to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, for coordinated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. That order also applies to "tag-along actions," or actions involving common questions of fact filed after January 17, 1991. Such actions are to be transferred to the eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of MDL 875, for coordinated pretrial proceedings. The JPML has held that a district court has the authority to stay pending a transfer order. In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 170 F. Supp. 2d 1348, 1349 n.1 (J.P.M.L. 2001)
K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

2

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 3 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

("[T]hose courts concluding that such issues should be addressed by the transferee judge need not rule on them, and the process of 1407 transfer in MDL-875 can continue without any unnecessary interruption or delay.") The parties agree that it is likely that the JPML will transfer this matter to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. However, to date, the Clerk of the JPML has not entered a Conditional Transfer Order pursuant to JPML Rule 12(a) or filed an order to show cause why the action should not be transferred, pursuant to JPML Rule 13(b). It is likely the dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3) and the Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31) and the deadlines imposed by Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, will come to pass before the Clerk of the JPML acts. In addition, Defendant TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION has not filed an answer in this matter. The parties make this Motion on the grounds that a stay of this action would (a) promote judicial efficiency, (b) allow consistency in pretrial rulings, and (c) be most convenient to the parties. Due to the pending action by the Clerk of the JPML, the parties hereby STIPULATE to and respectfully request the Court VACATE its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3) and Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31), and that the Court issue an Order STAYING this action pending the outcome of the MDL Panel's decision on the merits of the transfer. In the alternative, the parties hereby STIPULATE to and respectfully request that the dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3) and the Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31) be vacated and all deadlines set by Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, be continued pending the outcome of the JPML's decision on the merits of the transfer. Specifically, these deadlines in this matter include the August 15, 2007 Rule 26 deadline to meet and confer and file Joint ADR
K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

3

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 4 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Certification (set by the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3)), the August 15, 2007 Deadline to complete Initial Disclosure and Discovery Plan (set by Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3)), the August 29, 2007 deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement (set by Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3)) and the Case Management Conference currently set for Friday, September 21, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. (set by Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31)). Dated: June 27, 2007 BRAYTON~PURCELL LLP By: /s/ David R. Donadio ____________________ David R. Donadio Attorneys for Plaintiff FILICE BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP /s/ Susan A. Ogdie ________________________ Susan A. Ogdie, Ted Mechtenberg Attorneys for Hawker Beechcraft Corporation f/k/a Raytheon Aircraft Company, Defendant. Dated: July 3, 2007 BRYAN CAVE, LLP /s/ Tyler R. Johnson ________________________ Robert E. Boone III, Tyler R. Johnson Attorneys for McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant Dated: July 3, 2007 KNOTT & GLAZIER LLP /s/ Brian T. Clark ________________________ Brian T. Clark, Laura Patricia Yee Attorneys for Lockheed Martin Corporation, Defendant Dated: June 27, 2007 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP /s/ Derek Johnson ________________________ Derek Johnson Attorneys for General Electric Company, Defendant
K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Dated: July 2, 2007

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 5 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[PROPOSED]

ORDER TO STAY

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date and deadlines specified in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3) and Notice filed June 21, 2007 (Document 31), are hereby VACATED and that this action is STAYED pending the outcome of the JPML's decision on the merits of the transfer. Dated: _____________________ _____________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge

[PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE] ORDER TO CONTINUE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date and deadlines specified in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines filed May 14, 2007 (Document 3), are hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following case management deadlines are continued as follows: 1. Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process

selection, and discovery plan is [set for a date on or after November 1, 2007 to wit:] ________________, 2007; 2. Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or

Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference is [set for a date after November 1, 2007 to wit:] ________________, 2007; 3. Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection to Rule 26(f) Report,

file/serve Case Management Statement and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report is [set for a date after November 1, 2007 to wit:] ________________, 2007; and, /// /// ///

K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

5

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI

Case 3:07-cv-02542-SI

Document 34

Filed 07/03/2007

Page 6 of 6

1 2 3 4

4.

The Case Management Conference is [set for a date after November 1, 2007 to

wit: ] _________________, 2007 at ________ ___.m., Courtroom "______", _________th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Dated: _____________________

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
K:\Injured\107443\Stip stay or cont (fed19).wpd

_____________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge

6

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES ­ C07-2542-SI