Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 75.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 18, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 786 Words, 5,247 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7657/530.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 75.3 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-00305-SLR Document 530 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Youno CONAWAY SrAaoA·rr & TAYLOR, LLP
ttthttdttsai i01Sg¤%3Mz¤tWwEE¤¤Lgm¤ tti§.”ttttrat" “§ltt°..tKt‘§é
RJCILARBA. LEVINE 01=.t.A. MTE EST *]"R}gE*]*’ TH L()0R SANJAY BHATNAGAR lt .•.‘r‘¥Hew .
giiiitiiitiliiie giL$LrtCri3ii"Hliiiilt Wiuvttnoron, DELAWARE 19801 iiieiiiiiiiégpggiiii i-{Balm giiitlilixdihihdter
RICHARD H. MORSE CRAIG D. GREAR JEFFREY?. C.•\5TELLAN(} MICHAEL W. MCDERMGTI
”‘*Y"°‘ii"l$?.Zt‘¥.i.n El5iE§l‘i§`§it`i-iéiiittt *°‘°‘ BOX 39* Eshiwtilifdlttptaa lt’1“i?l%alI‘i&%?tt.
Conigiit k.AR$NI`¥Z PAUIJNE MORGAN \vH`°M{NGT0N‘ DELAWARE MARGARET M. DIBEANCA EDMUN 1. NORTON
“·*F*¥‘*t"t·‘*l*·*°‘*°*‘“" Sittstttst. <3¤¤>5’¤=—a¤¤ . tt*.‘:‘tt..5i.‘st" t§~tt.t3t”t.ttt“"”*t““
i{.”¢¥.iis~"3i€`Ei°~.E§ Lisa s.ew¤twi (son) ass-zzai (na owen miami. rms Maw. psa
lnnostn K.GnossmAN JGHN W. SHAW FAX: (302) 5·H_l253 {AN S. Fnzoemcics SEm1.Ri2tDEN¤£au
EUGENE A. DIPRJNEJO James P. Huomts. Ja Jmuas 3. GALLAGHER SARA Bern A. Rereuim
"“‘t“· Ptldldt iiddétitddlai `"”— §$t.’i.Ta?§“%t.. °"“"`t’}l§’$.t?l»i`r"t3itt8
t‘.ttEt.tts,t¤...a¤. mats. Lum: lewet t1~t$ms .»......t.t.;.....i... ....aT........
Tnuornrs. Siwozx Roth: P. BQSSELL PU- BOX 594 DAWN M. Jonas MtۤIAEL P. Stlxrroiun
BRUCE L. S§L\'ERSTEI'N SCOTT A. HDLT GE{);{GE·[gwN` [)E]'_,\wARE [Q947 KAREN E. KEl,.1.I3R CHAD 5.C. STOVER
Wsu.m.t W. Bowseu Joins T. Doustav 7 Jzwtrsn M. Kmxus loam E. TRACEY
LARRY J. TARAHICUS M. BLAKE CLEAR? (30—·I 856357; EowAru:• 5. Kosntowsiu Tir./wts N. Ttttustaa
Rrcnasm A. DlLlBElITO, IDL CHRESTIAN Douoms wnzmrr (800) 255-2234 (DE ONLY) Joint C. Kumar. suaomrr B. \Vl£%TEM.-\N
ME1.At~tIE K. SHARP DAN§ELLE QIBBS FAX: (392) 856_933E SHARON M. ZIEG
CASSAND? FFROHSRTS SPECIAL COUNSEL SENIOR COUNSEL
A.-gaeijlipm Etrm C. N0i¥J·1AN wWw·Y°UNGCONA“'“Y·CGM Joint D. i.ic1.Aue»n.m,1at curtis 1. cnowrumt
Nmu.1 Mnumi wats}: tunes L. PASCALE
putter ont; (sez) s71»sess» "‘*“"°‘* ** ""°°°“ ,,,,,‘§§,F,§}?§'§,$§,,,,,
DtREC1‘ FAX: (302) 576-3334 STUAR? H.You1~:c
§Shmv@ycSLcOm EDIVARD B. MAXIVEIJ., INI)
October l8, 2007
BY CM/ECF & HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson
United States District Court
5. Caleb Boggs Federal Bldg.
844 N. King St.
Room 6124, Lockbox 3l
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Syngenta v. Monsanto, C.A. No. 04-305-SLR
Dear Judge Robinson:
We represent plaintiff, Syngenta Seeds, Inc. ("Syngenta"), in the abovereferenced
antitrust case. We write to inform you of recent events that have changed the status of this case and
to request a conference to discuss scheduling a trial date.
This antitrust case (originally tiled as CA. No. 04—908—SLR) was consolidated with a
related patent case (CA. No. 04~305-SLR) in which Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology
LLC (collectively “Monsanto") aileged that Syngenta’s sales of GA2l corn products infringe U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,538,880, 6,013,863, and 4,940,835. in the related patent case, this Court granted
summary judgment, holding that Syngenta did not infringe two of the three Monsanto patents at
issue, and that the third patent was invalid (D.}, 376). Monsanto promptly tiled a Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b) motion for certification of the judgment (DJ. 383). On June 6, 2006, this Court granted that
motion (D.l. 411). Monsanto immediately appealed the patent decision. Monsanto also tiled a
motion to stay the antitrust trial pending resolution of the patent appeal (D.I. 48 8). On November 8,
2006, the Court granted that motion and stayed the trial "until the appeal of the patent case has been
resolved” (D.}, 522). At that tirne, discovery was concluded and the parties were preparing for trial,
which was then scheduled for January 8, 2007.
On October 4, 2007, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion affirming this Court’s
patent decision. See Enclosure. Per the Cou1t’s November 8, 2006 Order, this Court’s stay of the
osei;246v.s2·1.i os91ss.i0i0

Case 1:04-cv—00305—SLR Document 530 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Youmo Counwlw STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Sue L. Robinson
October 18, 2007
Page 2
antitrust trial is no longer in effect due to the Federal Circuit’s decision. Accordingly, Syngenta
respectfully requests a conference with the Court to discuss scheduling a new trial date.
Respectfully submitted,
QA Ls alwr
Jol W. Shaw (No. 3362)
JWS:l\/ITS
Enclosure
cc: Clerk ofthe Court (by hand delivery)
Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire (by e—n1ail and hand delivery)
Dl3Gl:2467827.l eseissiulu

Case 1:04-cv-00305-SLR

Document 530

Filed 10/18/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-00305-SLR

Document 530

Filed 10/18/2007

Page 2 of 2