Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I" \!
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MAR 13 2006
» FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT cpm-rv A. CATTERSON cuamc
1 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
i IGNACIO GARCIA-REBOLLAR, No. 05-77381
Petitioner, O [ " } 7 —aiAT
v. ORDER
— A UNITED STATES OP AMERI€’z¤¤·· rrrrt t · · · R v ‘ e r-rrr e e
Respondent.
Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion in the district court is denied. Petitioner has not made a prima facie
showing under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 of:
(l) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the -
evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and
convincing evidence that no reasonable fact finder would have found the
t d¢f¢¤d¤¤*¤ e¤i¤y_<31j.tt@§fe}S¢s OT M , __ . _ I . at in , c
(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral
review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.
No petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration shall be filed or
entertained in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E).
A mus cow _
‘ CATHY A. QAWERSON §
Clerk of Court _" §
DENIED. _,
Monrr l MAR 2006 ;i
1 ¤ ‘
Case 2:01-cr—OOO17-JAT Document 317 Filed 03/21/ my I .•- ··

Case 2:01-cr-00017-JAT

Document 317

Filed 03/21/2006

Page 1 of 1