1 2 3 4 5 6 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Paul E. Rhodes,
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Quirino Valeras, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________)
CV 04-644-PHX-JAT (MS)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's "Request" (Doc. # 76). Plaintiff requests
16
that the Court send him service packets to effect service on three additional Defendants
17
named in his Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is mistaken that his "Motion to
18
Amend" (Doc. # 55) was granted on February 16, 2006.
19 20
The undersigned
recommended that his motion be granted. As a result, Plaintiff's request is premature, and will be denied without prejudice. When Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is definitively
21
ruled upon, and if it is ultimately granted, Plaintiff may seek additional service packets
22
at that time. Accordingly,
23
IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's "Request" (Doc. # 76) is DENIED.
24 25
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2006.
26 27 28 Case 2:04-cv-00644-JAT-LOA Document 77 Filed 03/24/2006 Page 1 of 1