Qléiititrn ,%fati2z District Giuuri
FOR THE DISTRICT 01= ARIZONA
DAVID L- MAZET, Na.; ov 04 0493 Prix rm
Plaintiff, ORDER
vs.
HALLIBURTON COMPANY LONG-
TERM DISABILITY PLAN; and,
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT -
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
I The stipulation of the parties that the time for Plaintiff to tile his Reply in support of
2 his motion for summary judgment (re; remand issue) and his Response to Defendants Cross—
3 motion for summary judgment, (currently due August 27, 2007) may be extended to Friday,
4 August 31, 2007, being before the Court, and good cause appearing therefor
5 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Reply in support of his motion for
6 stunmary judgment (re: remand issue) and his Response to Defendants’ Cross—motion for
7 summary judgment, (currently due August 27, 2007) on or before Friday, August 3 I, 2007.
8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants’ time to file their Reply in support of
9 Cross—motion for summary judgment (currently due on September I0, 2007) shall be
10 extended correspondingly to Friday, September 14, 2007.
ll DATED this 28"‘ day of August, 2007. .
zevé/»‘e% Q , &%;Z,j’m.€..
Frederick J. Martone
United States District Judge
Case 2:04-cv-00493-FJIVI Document 65 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cv-00493-FJM
Document 65
Filed 08/29/2007
Page 1 of 1