Free Reply in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I
EI
D
EXHIBIT

I
Case 2:O4—cv—OO118-SI\/II\/I Document 97-2 Filed O2/22/2007 Page10f3



I LAw Or=F|cEs l
DoY|.E BERMAN {Z
2 GALLENSTEIN, P.C.
3300 NoRTH CENTRAL AvENuE, Sum; 1600
3 Pr-|oEN|x, AR|zoNA 85012-2524 .
(602) 240-6711 TE|.EPHONE NUMBER ’
4 (602) 240-6951 FACSIMILE NuMBER
[email protected] . ig
5 ARIZONA BAR NUMBER William H. Doyle, #007285 §
Gary L. Popham, Jr., #022260
6 ` 5
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant Market Finders Insurance Corporation
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA . -
9
10 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE No. CV04-l 18-PHX-SMM
COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, 1
U Plaintiff,
12 AFFIDAVIT OF
vs. ROGER M. SHERMAN, ESQ. 1Q
13 MARKET FINDERS INSURANCE .
14 CORPORATION, a Kentucky E;
corporation, iii
15 Defendant.
l6 ,
State of Arizona ) _
17 ` · ) ss.
County of Maricopa )
18 ls
19 I, Roger M. Sherman, Esq., being first duly sworn, deposes and states as follows:
20 l. I am an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona, and am

21 employed with the law firm of Potts & Associates which formerly represented Defendant
22 Market Finders Insurance Corporation in the above-captioned matter. I have personal {
23 knowledge of the statements set forth herein and believe them to be true and accurate to the
24 best of my knowledge. _
25 . . .
26
Case 2:O4—cv—OO118-SIVIIVI Document 97-2 Filed O2/22/2007 Page 2 of 3 V


11

l 2. I have reviewed Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company’ s Brief in Opposition
2 to Defendant Market Finders Insurance Corporation’ s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Expert and
3 the supporting Affidavit of Attorney Kathleen L. Beiermeister. i
4 I 3. While Attorney Beiermeister and I have discussed in connection with this
5 matter the topic of mediation, Attomey Beiermeister and I have never discussed potential
6 mediators or when a mediation was to occur. é
7 4. With respect to expert disclosure, I never agreed to limit expert disclosure
8 ending mediation. My expectations were that Plaintiff would comply with Rule 26(a),
p i
9 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court’s expert disclosure deadlines for expert I
l0 disclosure and other discovery requests.
ll FURTHER, AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. g
2 , I
1 ~ A
13 · . , gi
RO ER M. SHERMAN, E . gp
l4
l5 SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN to before me this (;2)$+ day of February, 2007.
16 . mp
‘ Notary ublic
l 8 ?
l9 My commission expires:
20 `t‘c m ugii 3,
2l Ai ce tapggéy i S
{ Km? My Commission Expires $2
22 L2 .... ..... ._ , , g
23
24
26 3
C:\D0cume11ts and Se\1iugs\k1is1eue\L0cal Sc1tiugs\Temporz1iy lntemel Files\OLKl3A\D6l009.\2d Finalized Februz1ry2l, 2007 V:
Case 2:O4—cv—OO118-SIVIIVI Document 97-2 Filed O2/22/2007 Page 3 of 3 3

Case 2:04-cv-00118-SMM

Document 97-2

Filed 02/22/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00118-SMM

Document 97-2

Filed 02/22/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00118-SMM

Document 97-2

Filed 02/22/2007

Page 3 of 3