4. FILED .
I WO ——**¤=¤~¤¤ I5?
2 cl-l5¤;lKDLF;:D;Ti1CSfU;;UHT; A
3 BY z%IE}i"UTY
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
S
9 United States of America, CR 04—50l62—00l—PHX—MHM
10 Plaintiff,
l l vs. I
12 Jesse Valdez, ORDER
13 Defendant.
14
15
‘ 16 A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on
17 Supervised Release were held on December S, 2006.
' 18 THE COURT FINDS that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and
19 voluntarily waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and
gg has consented to the issue of detention being made based upon t11e allegations in the Petition.
21 THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden
22 of proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32. l(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that
23 he is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529
24 (9th Cir. 1994).
25
26
27
28
ase 2:04—cr—50162-I\/IHIVI Document 23 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
1 IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the
2 court. _r‘__
3 DATED this [ 5 Hay of December, 2006.
4
5
6 ‘ U _Lawrence Oggtnderson
` 7 mted States M 1strate Judge
8
g .
10
11
12
13
14
15 `
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 2 -
Case 2:04-cr—50162-I\/IHIVI Document 23 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:04-cr-50162-MHM
Document 23
Filed 12/13/2006
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cr-50162-MHM
Document 23
Filed 12/13/2006
Page 2 of 2