Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT .
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10047
D.C. No. CR-04-01080-JAT
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUDGMENT
IUAN ANGEL TAPIA-ROJAS, aka Juan
Angel Tapia, Tobo Tapia, Cholo Juan '
Tobo, ‘
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix). l
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and herebyis DISMISSED.
Filed and entered 12/15/05
A G{$H$§%T·P$rEnsoN
§%_FEIé(TOF CCTUFIT
/__.,,,._* _ C ` ur.
. IL,
A ° 7 mp J ·»¤=.
Case 2:04-cr—O1080-JAT Document 26 Filed O1/06/2006 Paget of3

' Nor Pon PuP.L1cAr10N DEC 15 2005
rmrrsn STATES courar OF APPEALS °“T’J¥f?¢ FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OE AMERICA, No. 05-10047
Plaintiff- Appellee, D.C. No. CR-O4-01080-JAT
A MEMORANDUM"
JUAN ANGEL TAPIA-ROJAS, aka Juan
Angel Tapia, Tobo Tapia, Cholo Juan I
Tobo,
Defendant- Appellant. P
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 5, 2005 Mi
. Before:. GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Juan Angel Tapia-Rojas appeals the 21-month sentence imposed following
his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be
cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
`"` This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
I Case 2:04-cr—O1080-JAT Document 26 Filed O1/06/2006 Page 2 of 3

Q , , . . , _
U.S.C. 1320(a), enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. l
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen,
235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it
l is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. C0rtez—Arias,
403 Fsd 1111, 1114 11.8, amended by 425 1=.8d 547, 547-48 (9th Cir. 2005)
(holding that "a favorable change in thelaw does not entitle a defendant to renege iini H
on a knowing and voluntary guilty plea").
DISMISSED.
2118 E%Ӥedee~
{Court I I p
, en"

2
Case 2:04-cr-01080-JAT Document 26 Filed O1/06/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-01080-JAT

Document 26

Filed 01/06/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-01080-JAT

Document 26

Filed 01/06/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cr-01080-JAT

Document 26

Filed 01/06/2006

Page 3 of 3