Free Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 27.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 11, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 400 Words, 2,265 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/41436/73.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Arizona ( 27.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Vacate (2255) - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. David Gil Rodriguez, Defendant/Movant. United States of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-05-1807-PHX-DGC (DKD) CR-04-0606-PHX-DGC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendant/Movant David Gil Rodriguez's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). Dkt ##63, 71. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the motion. Dkt. #71 at 2, 3. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 3-4 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) ("The district judge . . . shall make a de novo determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made[.]"). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the motion.
Case 2:04-cr-00606-DGC Document 73 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same). IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan's R&R (Dkt. #71) is accepted. Defendant/Movant David Gil Rodriguez's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set

Aside or Correct /sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. #63) is denied. 3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 11th day of January, 2007.

-2-

Case 2:04-cr-00606-DGC

Document 73

Filed 01/11/2007

Page 2 of 2