Free Order of Detention - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

" it 4 ase 5:08-{mj-00212-DUTY Document5 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of2
Ihereinyaitestandceriifyon I _,;:n ` __ / O
L'?i'3'1L°12°32*"g.“°°`;"L$?`i$ a§§"1.ZT§ » ~— U ,. imnaieva
~·»d··%¤é·=.¤¤¤?:~ii;¤¤·¤¥5· Ly- T " ` ‘is- f XB gigggjiivdain iZ=ii¤i§i!‘$*“ """'”`°§°
r _, cg H T .___ _.*;=·m,·jjtg-. mso ‘
.E.5$§2f¤Si °éi’§Lcf .. e ee ¤-S-¤*S*“*°* °°'”" ,eR, E 0 nm
A ll *3 I ’ EUG
Dsvuw LE nc I- 0 -
5 3 nlxv 3 U 211-S _ . . - in
5 cement nisrrnscr on cA:,u=om~m.
E/¤.F3Tfi!”:?»'I?|`—’§LL€_'*7‘i A
6 v
7 cya @2;, 4*7*/-PH/#$363
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 i
I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case N0.: 7/Z »-/J')
11
Plaintiff}
12
V. ORDER OF DETENTION
13 6
14 /22%..2/ M/{P ./QJ
¤
· Defendant. ‘
15 i
16 i
i On motion by the government for pre-trial detention, the Court finds that no
17
I condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of
18
defendantas ]‘¢qui1‘cd( nn ·: :·· : :.· · ¤ ‘a . ¤ ¤• a an · a. y294/
19 .
The Court has considered the nature and circumstances of the offense(s); the
20 __
21 weight of evidence against the defendant; the history and characteristics of the
defendant; and the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the
22
3 community.
2
4 The Court bases the foregoing findings on the defendant’s non-objection to pre-
2
‘ _ 2 1 trial detention andthePretrialServices Report/Recommendation. 0
5 .
26
27 ` ITIS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained without prejudice prior
• evocation hearing.
28 j
onzmnz or nnrwrron
Case 2:04—or—00474-SRB Document 22 Filed 05/30/2008 Paget of2 Pagclufz

` ` _, ase 5:08—mjQ00212—DUTY Document 5 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant be committed to the custody of the
2 Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent -
3 practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody
4 pending appeal; that defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private
5 consultation with counsel; and that, on order of a Court of the United States or on
6 1‘Gql1CSt of 311}* BIIOITICY fO1` U18 gOVB1'I1I`DCI1t, tht? pS1‘S011 in Ch3I'gB of the CO1'1‘€CtiO11S
7 facility in which defendant is confined deliver defendant to a United States Marshal
8 for the purpose of any appearance in connection with a Court proceeding. This order
9 is made without prejudice to reconsideration.
10 5 i
ll Dated: gy
12 United States Magistrate Judge
I3
14
i 15
16
‘ 17
I8
19
20
21
22 I
23
24 U
25
26
27 y
28

se 2:04—cr—00474-SRB Document 22 ` Zlfiled 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2 Pagcmz

Case 2:04-cr-00474-SRB

Document 22

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cr-00474-SRB

Document 22

Filed 05/30/2008

Page 2 of 2