Free Certificate of Service - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 67.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,126 Words, 6,882 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35386/113.pdf

Download Certificate of Service - District Court of Arizona ( 67.0 kB)


Preview Certificate of Service - District Court of Arizona
UNITED S TA TES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
SWA Pointing, Inc.,
Piainnjji SUBPOENA INA CIWL CASE
v.
Golden Engle Insurance Corporation; Does I-100; -Distriet ofAfi},·on-a
XYZ Co_rporntion‘s 1-100; Block and Wk ite
Business Entities I-100,
Defendants. C¢oe.Numser: -CIV-03-23 64-PHX-D GC
T0: Robert Wal]
Wall & Sons Construction, Inc.
287 East Frye Road
Chandler, Arizona 85225
EI YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States. District Court at the place, date, and time specified below to testify in the
above case.
PLACE- OF TESTIMONY _ COURTROOM .-
401 West Washington, Room 525 Honorable David Campbell
Phoenix, Arizona
I}ATE[ AND TIM-E: Evideritiary Hearing on October 26, 2005 at
9500 a.m.
I:] YOU- ARE COMMANDED to appear at the place, date and time specified below`.to.-te‘stiii,»-at the taking ofa videotaped deposition
in the above case.
PLACE OF DEPOSITION: DATE AND TIME:
YOU ARE CQMMANDED to produce andpermit inspection- and copying ofthe following documents or objects at thc place, date, and time-
-speciF1ed below fl ist documents or objects):
PLACE DATE AND TIME
U YOU ARE COMMANDED to pennit inspection ofthe following premises at the date and time specified below,.
PREMISES DATE AND TIME-
Any organization not a party to this suit that is subpoenaed for the taking of a deposition-shall.-designate one or m0t‘e·.0fEeers,
directors, ormanaging agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its; behalf, may set forth, for each person designated, the matters
on which the person will testify. Federal Roi ‘ of Civil Procedure 3.0(b)(.6).
ISSUING OFFICER SIGNATURE AND T1`TLE·UNDICATE-‘H‘ ATTORNEY FOR P-LAINTIFF OR DEFHNDANT) DATE Oember 14, 2005
ATTORNEY FOR-.Defe¤oam
ISSUING OFFICEFCS NAME. ADDIUESS AND PHONE NUMBER JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULL PLC.
290.1 North Central Avenue, Suite·8{Z!O
Neil Singh, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona 85012
(602) 263-] 7.09


PROOF DF SERVICE

SERVED DATE-. EIACE
G/long £0flS·lY(/lCjl!ll[) lO# M/as 287 1:. V2}. C/'lc?/Jr/E"
SERVED (P'R1Nl"NAME`) MANNER OF. SERVICE
` `Rbbcml M \\ ] jg SD l
SERVED BY (PRINT NAME) TITLE
DECLARATION mr SERVER

I declare under pena1ty.df`pe1jury under the laws 6ft]1e‘U11il;ed_Sta1es of Am_erit:a that the foregoing iufcnnmien contained in the l’w¤‘f¤·f-Service-is true
and correct
f
Executed nn . .
‘Signetut~e of Server
-Address¤fSe1w·er ( Q
-
Rule 45. Federal Rules ef Civil Procedure. Parts-C & DEFENDANTS: (B). ifs subpoena-
(e} PROTECTION OF EBRSONS SUBJECT T0 SUBPOENAS. (E) req.td1es disclnsureefs rrsidesecret or other eqntidentiel
(1] A perry cr an euumcy-res;iu‘nsib}e for tI1e.:iss1mnee and service-cfs research. development, or commercial infnrmminn, or
subpoena shall tsgke teastmable steps to amid imposing imdb: burdeper _ (E] req_uir¤s.disel¤sure ¤`f·s.n unretaiued expertls opinion or
uns-person subject te that subpoena. The ‘¤ei.u1 m1 behalf of which the subpoena- infmmstlen not .deserlbir1g specihe exgems nr cccunences in dispute and resulting
wss .jԤsued-shall ehfomee this duty and impose upon the party ur-ettmhey in breach {ium the expestls study made-not at-theurequest nfany party; or
ufthis duty an appnuprisife sartetinn. whlch mgy include, but is limited tn, lust {iii] s who is rmt s er an eflieer cfa party te
·esr11isgs and s_ress¤nsble.a¤cmey's fee. _ "incur siabstsntiel eggpensetu tyavel then IDD mil tb‘stte11;ltriLsl, the ;:¤_trpt
(2){A) A person cenmmnded to produce sud permit inspection and may, te; protect a-person subject tn ur sl’l`e¤te_d by the subpoena. quash er rhudify
copying cfdesigrmted .d0QI.IID'lE1'IIS ¤r.:2i;i1gible thirtgs., er irispeetiun the subpoena cr, ifthr: in whose behalf the subpoena is issued shows- a
ufpreniisesneed rmt appear in person st the place efpreduclien or inspection substantial need for the testimnnypr uisberial that-csnnut be utherwise met
unless commanded Ln appear for-deposition, hearing ur trial. without undue l1srd'ship.andiassures that the person te wh¤¤m"tl1e·-subp0‘en*s is
{B) Subject tu (Defend; euuuinended te p1?¤ducc.and permii"inspeeiiq11·ani1 eppyiug may; within L4: days- prudttetinn only upon specified etirrditicns.
aher service ofthe subpoena or before the- ti111e_-specified for compliance if such jfbefendantsl DUTIES-IN TO SUHPOENA. _
time is less than 14- days a11er_service, serve upon the pany urattomey-des`iga1med (1) A person responding to s subpoena tu produce documents shall
`in Lliesubpqens written_ebjec:ibn up inspection er dfsamy pr- all uf the them as they src kept in the usual cetrzse bfbusiness or shall urgsnifie and
designated materials er efthe premises-. Lfbbjection is made, the party serving the Label them rrr t£¤1·respQnd with the categtirics in ll'}E`dEIl'IBZ|'Id.
subpoena shall mt be entitled te inspect and eugy the uiaterials-er_ir1s‘p‘ect the (2) \l'r'l1en·i11f’drmstie11 subject to s subpoena is withheld tm a claim that-_ is
premises except p_ursusm.t¤t.s,n nrder ofthe ecurt by which the subpoena wes privileged er subject to pretectiun setrial preparation materials, the claim shall be:
issued- lfnbjectlun hss been made.-the party sewing the subpoena msy, upon n1sde_eXpres$ly.snd-.shslI be supported by s _descripti¤n ofthe nature ofthe
rrdtice to the person commanded to produce, move st any-tlrnefcr atn nrder tu d0I2'I.IJI'l18ZI1tS, e¤mrrux¤ieeti0ns,· nr ilrjngs.-not produced ihstis sulHeieuLt¤ enable the
enmpel the péqdtnqtinn. Suchim ¤¤der_t0.c0mpel prcductipn shall protect my demsngiirigparty te-contest the claim.
person wha-is. net ti perky cr arr officer of 3 sigt1ili_cs11t.expeuse resulting l
hem the inspection and copying commanded.
{SMA-) Ontimelymetinn, Lhe édurt by whiehm subpuens was issued shall
qttesh- ur modify the.st1bj¤qgg1s ifit
(i) fails to allow reasonable time for compliance
{ii) requires.; person .w]1‘¤ is nm 3 party or an officer nfs party-
tn prsvsl te an-plsbe mere than l00 miles trend place iyinliere thatpersun resides,
is employed ur regularly transsets business in person,-·except· that, subject le lhe
prm··isi¤11.el`clause·{e)(3}[B}[iii}ofthis rule, such a persun may in erdertuwattend
trial be tp travel from snysueh plspc within the state in which the
_t1·i¤l` is held; er _
{iii) requires eiiselusure ufptivileged nr other protected-rmttter
arid ne escepjiern cr wai§rer.`spp1ies;.¤r
{is) subjects si peasimtu undue burden.
Case 2 :03-cv-02364-DGC Docu ment 113 Filed 10/24/2005 Page 2 of 2
1.-4 5673 ¤_1

Case 2:03-cv-02364-DGC

Document 113

Filed 10/24/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-02364-DGC

Document 113

Filed 10/24/2005

Page 2 of 2