Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 County of Maricopa, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the court is Plaintiff's Notice of Bankruptcy Discharge and Abandonment of Claims (doc. #57), in which plaintiff requests an extension until October 3, 2005, within which to file his responses to certain pending motions. Also before the court is Defendants' Motion to Strike Summary Judgment Reply (doc. #58), which seeks to strike plaintiff's Reply in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment for exceeding the 11-page limit imposed by LRCiv 7.2(e) without leave of the court. The court will grant both motions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Notice of Bankruptcy Discharge and Abandonment of Claims (doc. #57) is granted to the extent that it requests an extension of time until October 3, 2005, for plaintiff to file the following: 1. Plaintiff's reply in support of his Motion to Compel Withdrawal of Counsel Daniel Brenden and Request for Sanction (doc. #43); 2. Plaintiff's reply in support of Motion to Compel Separation of Parties (doc. #44);
Case 2:03-cv-02119-NVW Document 59 Filed 09/30/2005 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scott M. McNair, Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 03-2119 PHX NVW ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3. Plaintiff's reply in support of his Motion to Compel Disclosure of Witness Information (doc. #45). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Summary Judgment Reply (doc. #58) is granted and that Plaintiff's Reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #55) is stricken for exceeding the 11-page limit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file a substitute reply in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed 11 pages by October 3, 2005. DATED this 27th day of September, 2005.

-2Case 2:03-cv-02119-NVW Document 59 Filed 09/30/2005 Page 2 of 2