Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

SRM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case 2:03-cv-01940-EHC-JRI Document 69 1 - Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Lorenzo Cruz Falco, Plaintiff -vsCharles Ryan, et al, Defendant(s) CV-03-1940-PHX-EHC (JI) ORDER

NOTICE - WARNING TO PLAINTIFF - Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss a portion of your complaint. Plaintiff is advised of the following specific provisions of Local Civil Rule 7.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona: (e) Length of Motions and Memoranda. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments. *** (i) Briefs or Memoranda of Law; Effect of Non-Compliance. If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements of this Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required answering memoranda . . . such non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the . . . granting of the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Response - Plaintiff shall have until April 6, 2006 within which to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 1, 2006 (#68). 2. Reply - Defendants shall have fifteen days from service of the responsive memorandum within which to file a reply. 3. Joint Proposed Pre-Trial Order - In the event that this motion to dismiss remains pending on any deadline set for filing of a jointly proposed pre-trial order, then such deadline

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

shall be extended to a date thirty (30) days following the entry of an order disposing of this motion to dismiss.

DATED: March 3, 2006
S:\Drafts\OutBox\03-1940-68o Order 06 03 02 re Sched MTD.wpd

_____________________________________ JAY R. IRWIN United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01940-EHC-JRI

Document 69 2 - Filed 03/06/2006 -

Page 2 of 2