SAPIRO v. SUNSTONE HOTELS INVESTORS, L.L.C., et al. Case No. CIV03-1555 PHX SRB
Exhibit Index Motion in Limine No. 4 Regarding Evidence or Testimony Concerning OSIIA as Establishing the Standard of Care
Exhibit A
Plaintift·' Supplcmcntal dated March 21, 2005
Response
to Defendants'
Interrogatory No. 8,
Exhibit B
1,;xhibit
Excerpts from deposition transcript of Matthew R. Frcijc, taken April 29,
2005
C
San Marcos Fact Sheet, dated August 27, 2003
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 1 of 9
EXHIBIT A
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 2 of 9
DAVID W. SttAPIRO, AZ BAR NO. 015295 ANN M. GALVANI (Pro IIac Vice, Sept. 29, 2003) STEVEN W. DAVIS (Pro Itac Vice, Aug. 26, 2003) JORGE SCHMIDT (Pro Hac Vice, March 17, 2005) BOIES, SCIIILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 100 S.E. 2 ·d Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-8400
Facsimile:
(305) 539-1307
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
!N THE DISTRICT COURT Oi; ARIZONA
PtIOENIX DIVISION
MARVIN SAPIRO and GLORIA SAPIRO,
his wife,
Case No.: CIV 03 1555 PttX SRB
Plaintiffs,
VS.
PI,AINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE I'O DEFENDANTS' INTERROGA ORY No.
SUNSTONE t t·OTEI, INVESTORS, L.L.C., SUNSTONE tIO'FEL INVESTORS, L.P.,
Defendants.
TO:
Defendants SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, L.L.C., SUNSTONE HOTEL ,NV·,STORa, L.P.
Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs
MARVIN SAPIRO and GLORIA SAPIRO submit this supplemental response to "Defendants'
Interrogatories to Plaintiff."
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 3 of 9
ANSWERS I O IN'I ERROGATORIES
2
3
All of the General Objections and Reservations o fRights are incorporated into each of
4
the individual answers to interrogatories.
8.
5
6
7
State specifically and in detail the facts and evidence upon which plaintiffs' contention is based that the incident as alleged in plaintiffs' Complaint was caused by any negligent conduct on the part of the defendants.
Plaintiffs note that discovery is ongoing and reserve the right to further supplement their
answers to this
8
Interrogatory. In
9
addition to Plaintiffs' earlier supplementation of thei:
10
Response
to this interrogatory, Plaintiffs also contend that the
San Marcos
was
negligent ir
ll
12
13
failing to follow Sunstone's own Standard Operating Procedures concerning bacteria
contamination, legionella, and OSHA procedures. See, e.g., SUNST330-332, 437, 473,
500.
anc
14
15
Dated: March 2I, 2005
BOIES, SCt·ILI·LR & I·LEXNER LLP
By:
16
17
18
D_A i i· ·V·,_.S HAp
·
19
2O
21 22
23
AN M. GALVAN!, STEV-EN W. DAVIS
JORGE SCtIMIDT
Mini, Florida 33 i3
[a··
0
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 100 S.E. 2 ·a Street, Suite 2800
Telephone (305) 539-8400 Attorneys fbr Plaint·"
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB Document 132-2 TO DEFENDANTS INTERROGATORIES 9 Filed 12/05/2005 Page 4 of
EXHIBIT B
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 5 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
MARVIN SAPIRO and GLORIA
SAPiRO,
his wife,
5
Plaintiffs,
ORIGINAL
*
6
7
8
v.
CASE NO. CIV 03-1555 PHX SRB
SUNSTONE HOTELS
9
INVESTORS LLC,
SUNSTONE
I0
HOTEL INVESTORS L.P.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
DEPOSITION OF MATTHEW R.
!6
1"7
FREIJE
TAKEN AT SAN DIEGO,
CALIFORNIA
2005
FRIDAY, APRIL 29,
18 19
2O
ATKINSON-BAKER,
COURT REPORTERS
22
INC
61.0 West Ash Street
23
24
Suite 901
San Diego,
California 92101
(800) 288 3376
Reported by:
Angela Schultz-Messenger, CSR No.
11742
25
FiLE NO.:
9F02EIC
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 6 of 9
1
A.
I didn't bring the entire document, no.
i
didn't bring my entire library that has a lot of other
3
4
5
papers and so forth on Legionella control.
Q.
Well, you haven't referenced your entire library
have you?
in your report,
A.
6
7
8 9
i0
No.
Q.
Okay.
You were asked to bring to this
deposition any and all material that you relied on specifically as it relate<] to your opinions in this case,
true?
A.
12
And I believe I responded that I have a very
and a lot of my research makes up my
can
extensive library,
13
knowledge of the subject.
bring every
publication.
]5
Q.
Well,
I'm not asking about every publication.
16
You suggest that you rely upon what OSHA has generated by
17
]8 ].9
way of guidelines or regulations in support of your
perspective that San Marcos failed to adhere to its duty
to its guests.
A.
True?
2o
That's one of the dqcuments I would reference.
21 22
23
Q.
Okay.
And in that respect, you've not attached
of the portions of that document that you
a copy of all
rely upon in support of your opinion, nor have you
brought all of the portions of that document here today.
25
True?
141
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 7 of 9
EXHIBIT C
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005
Page 8 of 9
Sheraton San Marcos
Fact Sheel
8/27/03
Itotel management learned yesterday that bacteria had been found in one of its boilers in the East Wing
building.
We immediately closed the building.
An environmental testing service has reported
to us that this
contamination is likely a form of Legionella, a bacteria that can cause Legionnaire's disease (Legionellosis). We
have notified the Maricopa County tIealth
occurence and we are
Department,
as
well
as
the Arizona Department of llealth Services of this
a Level
currently following OStIA guidelines for
One Investigation. This environmental
testing service has conducted tests throughout the affected building, which will remain closed until it is safe to
reopen. All heating and cooling and hot and cold water systems in all hotel buildings are being tested today. We
have no reason to think that we wiI1 find any additional bacteria in the hotel. We expect the testing and disinfecting of all hotel systems to rcqmrc about 14 days to complete.
Our check of the affected boiler was prompted by the recent receipt of information confirming the illness of
a
former out-of-state guest of the hotel. Six months had elapsed since the guest's stay. Prior to this notification, we
had received no other complaints or reports of illness. After a preliminary call from the environmental testing firm yesterday confirmed tile presence of the
bacteria, we immediately commenced a thorough testing program at the hotel.
No other guests
or
employees have reported
a
diagnosis of Legionnellosis, the symptoms for which
at
generally resemble pneumonia (see Center tbr Disease Control
www.cdc.gov). OSHA suggests that if you
see a
are nol
experiencing pneumonia or flu-like symptoms, ·bere is no need to
We have arranged fi·r
an answer line
to
doctor."
staffed by independent health professionals to talk confidentially with
any of our employees or guests as needed
address their questions as they arise. In addition, the Maricopa County
as is the Arizona
Department of Itealth Services is available to answer questions,
Contact:
Department of Iealth Services.
Gary A. Stougaard
Executive Vice President
Office: 949.369.4280
Cell: 619.709.4461
www.OSIIA.gov/SLTC/ctools/lcgionnaires/samplc lctter.htmi
903 Calle Amanecer-Suite 100 San Clemente, CA 92673-6212 Tel. 94£.369.4000 Fax 949.369.4210
SUNST13I
Page 9 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-01555-SRB
Document 132-2
Filed 12/05/2005