Free Order on Motion to Stay - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Continental Promotion Group, Inc., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. # 135) pursuant to Rule 62(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having considered Defendant's unopposed motion and finding good cause: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. # 135) is GRANTED and that all proceedings to enforce or execute upon the Judgments entered in this case in favor of Plaintiff on February 3, 2006, and July 27, 2006, are stayed pending the final determination of Defendant's appeals filed from the Judgments; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doc. # 136, which is a duplicate filing of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. # 135), is DENIED as moot; /// /// /// ///
Case 2:03-cv-00375-JAT Document 138 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ericsson, Inc., Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 03-00375-PHX-JAT ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the form and amount of the Letter of Credit proposed by Defendant is approved as adequate security (in lieu of a supersedeas bond) for the stay pending appeal issued herein. DATED this 21st day of August, 2006.

-2Case 2:03-cv-00375-JAT Document 138 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2