Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 City of Chandler, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court required Plaintiffs to submit the statements because the Court found in the July 8 order that Plaintiffs were entitled to attorneys' fees on only some of the claims for which they moved.
Case 2:03-cv-00249-JAT Document 167 Filed 02/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dible, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 03-00249-PHX-JAT ORDER

On July 8, 2005, this Court entered an order awarding attorneys' fees to Defendants associated with litigating Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim, Motion for New Trial and Motions for Order to Show Cause and for Rule 11 Sanctions (Doc. # 128). On February 7, 2006, this Court entered an order awarding attorneys' fees to Defendants associated with litigating Plaintiffs' copyright claim (Doc. # )166. Plaintiffs have submitted Statements of Fees associated with litigating these issues as follows: 1) Breach of contract claim, $4,705.07 (Doc. # 134); 2) Defendants' Rule 11 Motion, $2,582.72 (Doc. # 133); 3) Plaintiffs' Supplements to Their Motion for New Trial and Their Motion for Order to Show Cause/Rule 11, $8,321.50 (Doc. # 135); and 4) Copyright Claim, $681.02 (Doc. # 136).1 The

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Court has considered the Defendants' statements of fees and Plaintiffs' objection and finds that the fees requested by Defendants are reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for Defendants and against Plaintiffs in the amount of $16,290.31. DATED this 9th day of February, 2006.

-2Case 2:03-cv-00249-JAT Document 167 Filed 02/13/2006 Page 2 of 2