Free Answer to Interrogatories - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 39.0 kB
Pages: 6
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,102 Words, 7,347 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/7545/58.pdf

Download Answer to Interrogatories - District Court of Delaware ( 39.0 kB)


Preview Answer to Interrogatories - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN CARROLL, LARRY ) MCGUIGAN, NURSE BRYANT, LT. ) STANTON, CPT MERSON, CPT. SAGAR, ) NATE GARDELS, CPT. BELANGER, ) MICHAEL ALLEN, and INTERNAL ) AFFAIRS, ) ) Defendants. ) ANIBAL MELENDEZ,

C. A. No. 04-193-SLR

STATE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Defendants Warden Thomas Carroll, Deputy Warden Larry McGuigan, Corporal Lise Merson, Captain Clyde Sagers, Officer James Gardels, Captain Joseph Belanger, Internal Affairs, and Officer Michael Allen ("State Defendants") hereby respond to Plaintiff's Request for Interrogatories ("Interrogatories"): GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they seek

information or documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 2. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they

purport to require supplementation of these responses beyond that required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). 3. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they

Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 2 of 6

purport to place duties upon the State Defendants not set forth in, or contemplated by, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they

purport to seek information or documents not in the possession, custody or control of the State Defendants. 5. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they seek

the production of documents equally available to the Plaintiff or Plaintiff's counsel. Such documents will be identified by the State Defendants, but will not be produced. 6. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they

purport to require production of information or documents which are impractical or unduly burdensome to reproduce. 7. State Defendants object to the Interrogatories to the extent that they seek

the production of documents generated by or received from counsel for State Defendants in connection with this litigation on or after the date of the acceptance of representation on the grounds that such documents are protected by attorney-client and work product privileges. RESPONSES Subject to, and without waiver of the foregoing General Objections and those set forth in State Defendants' Responses, State Defendants respond, after a reasonable search, and subject to supplementation, as follows: 1. State the duties of defendant Bryant, Medical administrator of Delaware

Correctional Center ("Smyrna"). If these duties are set forth in any job description or other document, produce the document.

Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 3 of 6

RESPONSE: Objection. This Interrogatory seeks information not within the knowledge or control of State Defendants. 2. State the duties of defendant Larry McGuigan, Deputy Warden for

administration at Smyrna. If these duties are set forth in any job description or other document, produce the document. RESPONSE: Larry McGuigan is the Deputy Warden at DCC. He reports to the warden and assists with the daily operations of the facility. 3. State the names, titles, and duties of all staff members at Smyrna other

than defendant Nurse Bryant who had responsibility for ensuring the inmates' requests for medical attention. If those duties are set forth in any job description or other document, produce the document. RESPONSE: Objection. This Interrogatory is vague, overly broad and unduly burdensome and seeks information not within the knowledge or control of State Defendants. 4. State the procedure in effect during December, 2003 at Smyrna for

conducting sick call, including the procedure by which inmates sign up for or request sick call. If the procedure is different for segregation inmates than for general population inmates, state both procedures. If those procedures are set forth in any policy, directive, or other document, produce the document. RESPONSE: Objection. This Interrogatory seeks information not relevant to the claims set forth in the complaint nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Further objection that this Interrogatory seeks production of confidential information protected from discovery by 11 Del. C. § 4322. Without waiving these

Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 4 of 6

objections, in the maximum housing unit, the inmate obtains a sick call slip from an officer on the cell block or from a member of the medical staff on the cell block. The inmate then returns the sick call slip to either medical staff or an officer. If the sick call slip is returned to an officer, the officer forwards the slip to the medical department. 5. State the names, titles, and duties of all staff members at Smyrna who

have responsibility to, investigate or deciding inmate grievance. If those duties are set forth in any job description, policy, directives or other documents, produce the document. RESPONSE: Objection. This Interrogatory seeks production of confidential information protected from discovery by 11 Del. C. § 4322. Without waiving this objection, inmate grievances are handled by the individual(s) most knowledgeable with respect to the allegations set forth in the grievance. 6. State the procedure in effect during December, 2003 at Smyrna for

responding to, investigating and deciding inmate grievance. If the procedure for handling grievance based on medical complaints is different from the procedure for handling other kinds of grievance, state both procedures. If these procedures are set forth in any directive, manual or other kind of document, produce the document. RESPONSE: Objection. This Interrogatory seeks production of confidential information protected from discovery by 11 Del. C. § 4322. Without waiving this objection, DCC's Procedure No. 4.4, "Inmate Grievance Procedure," is available for plaintiffs' review upon request directed to the tier officer, the grievance officer or the law library. Both medical grievances and non-medical grievances are handled in the same manner.

Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 5 of 6

As to Objections:

STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE /s/ Eileen Kelly Eileen Kelly, I.D. No. 2884 Deputy Attorney General Carvel State Office Building 820 North French Street, 6th fl. Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8400 [email protected] Attorney for State Defendants

Dated: August 29, 2005

Case 1:04-cv-00193-SLR

Document 58

Filed 08/29/2005

Page 6 of 6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 29, 2005, I electronically filed State Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Request for Interrogatories and Production of Documents with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I hereby certify that on August 29, 2005, I have mailed by United States Postal Service, the document to the following non-registered party: Anibal Melendez

/s/ Eileen Kelly Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French St., 6th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8400 [email protected]