Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I Rebert Hardy Falk, Est;.
QX 96T95399 ,p.t'·tZ1· hm: vice}
2 RO ERT HARDY FALK, P.C.
Past Ofliee Bm; T94?4S
3 Dallas, Texas 715329
Tel.: [214) 954-499
4 Fax: {1214) 969-5941
E-n1a1l: [email protected]
5
6 Michael O. Aekertnati, Esq.
{CA 64992, pre imc vice)
I ACRERIVIAN AND KEVORKIAN
2391 The Alameda, Suite 199
B Santa Clara, CA 95959
Tel.: {493; 261-5899
9 Fax: [493 261-5999
E-mall: [email protected]
19
Atternelys fnr Plaintiff, _
I1 RONA D CRAIG FISH, a law eerperatien
I2
I3 LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I4 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
I5
_ RONALD CRAIG FISH, a Iavv eerparatien, al Case Ne. CIV-93-6T-PHX-SMIMI
19 California enrperatien, I
II Plaintiff, I PLA[N'I`IFF’S MOTION TO FILE
I sunnarnv
19 vs. g
19 'l"I—IOl‘vlAS G. WATKINS, III, an individual; I
SKYLINE I'vIANUFACI`URINO, INC., an I
29 Arizena enrpnratidn, §
21 Defendants. %
sl
* 22
L 23 Plaintiff, Ranald Craig Fish, a law earpnratien, hereby rneves the Cnnrt fnr leave
24 tn file a surreply an the gnaund that defendants, in their reply metndrandnm, have
25 misrepresented the reedrd nn their mntinn fdr snn‘nnaryjt1tlgnnent sp as te deny plaintiff,
2 _ the nt:·n—meving party, a neasnnable nppartnnity te respend tn the arguments advaneed in
6
2 defendants’ reply. When a mnving party advanees in a reply new teasens and evidenee in
T
3 suppett e·f its rneitiein fdr sumrna1yjndg1nent, the nan-party must be granted an ,
2 ..
PLA[NTIFF’S MOTION I`O FILE SURREPIN
- I - Case N6. CIV-93-6T-PHX-Slvllvl
Case 2:03—cv—00067-SI\/II\/I Document 133 Filed 05/18/2006 Page1 0f4

I opportunity to rcspond. (Bcairrl v. Soagatc Tcchnology, Inc. 145 F.3d I 159, at pagc IIG4
2 [IU"` Cir. IQQ3) citing Cia Potrolcra Caribc, Inc. v. Arco Caribbcan,1nc. 254 F.2d 434,
3 413 {lm Cir. I935). Soo also Vais Arms, [nc. v. Vais 333 F.3d 232, 292 {5"‘ Cir. 2334).)
4 Dcfcndants rcpcatcdly roprosont throughout thoir rcply rnornorandnm that Judgc
5 Murgula, in dismissing counts DDC and thrcc of plaintiff’s complaint in thc undcrlying
o action, did not do so with rcspcct to Fish. {Rcply Mcrnorandum, pagc ti lincs 5-15 and
2 lincs 3·l I; pagc T, lincs I3-ISL) To avoid thc possibility ofthis Court bcing niislcad by
8 dofcndants° argurncnts, plaintiff rcqucsts lcavc of tho Court to Elo a surrcply simply
9 pointing out to thc Court that portion of Juclgc Murguia’s ordct that spccitically addrosscs
IU thc issuc.
l l
12 DATED: May/jfQJ2·I]I)o ACKERMAN AND KEYDRKIAN
/ {IJ-};. /
rs ‘ ff .
.3//- 2,/-· . fx /5/·‘ '
14 By: fl/¤”§¢C» l~ af
. ‘ I H s . _ .
15 x _ Attorrtcljfs for Plaintiff, Ronald Craig
,/ Fish, a aw corporation
lo
17 Robcrt Hardy Falk, Esi.
é)TX UGTQSBUU ,§ro or: rica-.?]
lg R BERT HARD FALK, PHC.
Post Cltticc Box. T94?43
1p Dallas, Tcxas 25329 ,
2[1 C;"-lk*[yDocs“.Fish*.ArixonallwiS.l‘tDppl•~·ltnSJl•t··I.l•·.#ltnF¤|ct—§ui·rcply.·tt·p¤:l
2l
* 22
L ss
24
25
2o
2T
23
PLAIl"·lTIFF’S MOTION 'l`U· FILE SURREPLY
- 2 - Casc No.C1‘v'-D3-6T—PHX—SiylM
Case 2:03—cv—00067-SI\/II\/I Document 133 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 2 of 4

I The undersigned declares;
2 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of Santa Clara County, State of
3 California. I am over the age ofeightcen {I S) years and not a party to the within
4 above-entitled action. My business address is 239] The Alameda, Suite IUU, Santa Clara,
5 CA 95U5U.
Ei On May I3, 2UU6, I served a copy of the following document{s) described as;
it - PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO FILE SURREPLY
s on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof in a seated envelope
EJ addressed to the person[s] listed below:
to Darrell S. Dudzik, Es . Robert Hardy Falk, Esq.
HINSHAW & CULULERTSON ROBERT HARDY FALK, P.C.
I I EEUU North Central Avenue, Suite loUU P.O. Box T94?43
Phoenix, Ariziona S5Ul2—l9=¤l-fi Dallas, Texas TSBTU
I2 Email: DDudeik@hinshawlaa=.com Email: [email protected]
Facsimile: (GHB) dj'}-¤i4`il4` {Attorneys tor Plaintiff, Ronald Craig
13 {Attomeys for Defendant, Thomas G. Fish, A Law Corporation)
Watkins, III] i
14 { } (By LLS. Mall} I am readily familiar with my employer’s business practice for
15 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal
16 Service. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
ll postal cancellation date oi· postage meter is more than one day after dated of deposit for
lg mailing in aftidavit. I deposited such envelopeis] with postage thereon fully paid to be
li} placed in the United States Mail at Santa Clara, Califomia.
QU [ X } (By E-Mall} I caused a true copy ofthe foregoing document to be served on
21 Darrell S. Dudzik and Robert Hardy Falk via e-mail at the e·mail address listed above.
I 22 Each e—mail was complete and no reports of error were received.
l 23 [X} {By Facsimile) I served a true and correct copy by facsimile pursuant to C.C.F.
24 lUl3[e}, calling for agreement and written contirination of that agreement on court order,
25 to the rlutrlberls] listed above or on an attached sheet. Said transmission was reported
26 complete and without error.
El [ ) (By California Overnight Mail) I served a true and correct copy enclosed in a
ES sealed package, for Califomia Ovemight collection and for overnight delivery. I marked

- 3 - Case No. CI‘·.*—U3—(i?-PHX-SMM
Case 2:03—cv—00067-SI\/II\/I Document 133 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 3 of 4

I said envelepe fer ccllecticn and eycrnight delivery tc the addressed and tc the effice et`
2 the addresseefs) as aheye indicated. In the erdinary eeurse cfbusiness and including said
3 evemiglit envelcpes, will he depesitcd with Calitnernia Overnight at Santa Clara,
4 Califemia
5 (X) (Federal Unly) I declare that I am ernpleyed in the effiee eta member cfthe hat
6 et` this Ceurt at whese directien the service was made.
T I declare under penalty et` perjury under the laws ef the United States eIAmeriea
S and the State c¤t`Calii`ernia that the feregeing is true and cerreet and that this declaraticn
9 was executed cn May IS, 2t]t]+5, at Santa Clara, Califzzu ` . w I
I] lt L _ _
12 I
13
14
I5
I6
I?
IS
19
2t}
21
22
23 i
24
25
26
27
23

— 4 — Case Ne. CIV-U3—62·PIlX-EMM
I Case 2:03—cv—00067-SI\/II\/I Document 133 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 133

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 133

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 133

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-00067-SMM

Document 133

Filed 05/18/2006

Page 4 of 4