Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

W [ FILED LLQDGED A
1 §1T61t1§YO§§%%;%5 ___ Hscervsu ______ cow A
em e,
2 rei; 13480-593-4444 FEB 2 7 2006 ·
3 Fax: 602-268-6644 .
Plaintiff (pro se) CLERK U S DJS·TR|C1f COURT
_ DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
4 _ ` i T ' n 3
5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8 Ammar Halloum NO. CIV—02-02245-PHX-EHC
9 Plaintiff PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN
OPOSITION TO DEFENDAN’T
10 Vs. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE
ll STATEMENT
Intel Corporation,
12 . Defendant.
I3
14 Intel Corporation,
1 5 Counterclaimant,
16 Vs.
17 Ammar Halloum and Sawsan Hamad
1 8 Counterdefendants.
19 MOTION
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Ammar Halloum hereby moves this Court not to
20
21 accept Defenda;nt’s Intel Corporation supplemental disclosure statement filed on
22 February I3, 2006 for the following reasons.
23 The time line for discovery has expired few months ago, and the Jury Trial
24
was scheduled for February 14, 2006, then it was rescheduled for April 18, 2006.
25
26 In the Final Pretrial Conference on February 6, 2006, Counsel for
27 Defendant’s Intel Corporation stated to the Judge that all discoveries have been
28
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 141 Filed O2/27/2006 Page 1 of 2

I concluded.
2 The Decision that Defendant is attempting to use as a supplemental
7
Disclosure statement included opinion, and unreasonable justifications in contrary to
4
5 1ntel’s witnesses’ admission during the trial in the ALJ Case No. 2003-SOX-7 that
6 Intel committed wrong doing in presenting the Ground Rules and the Hopes and Fears
7 to Plaintifi and that Intel admitted to 3.3 million Dollars in delayed invoices ALJ Trial
8
Tr. At 1178).
9
10 The decision is appealable and will be appealed by the Plaintiff.
11 Plaintiff respectfully request this Court to reject Defendant’s Supplemental
12 Disclosure Statement.
13
14
15 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 2'( day of February 2006.
16
17 By:
P a1nt1 mar a o 1, pro se
18
19
20 The Original submitted
this ig day of February, 2006
21 Honorable Judge Earl H. Carroll
And
22 United States District Court
23 A Copy ofthe foregoing
24 mailed this _g;(day of February, 2006 to:
Michael D. Moberly
25 One North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85001-4414
26 Attorney for Defendant Intel Corporation
28
-2-
Case 2:O2—cv—O2245-EHC Document 141 Filed O2/27/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 141

Filed 02/27/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-02245-EHC

Document 141

Filed 02/27/2006

Page 2 of 2