Free Petition to Revoke Probation/Release - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

. P_Prob‘l2.frrn ‘
g_Rev.`]_2iL04) \ Q FILED __ LQQGE3
` 8** “‘~·-·" ___ aecemc H__ cc-av
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO RT _ ,, .
for Jmv L tlzuua
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA otsrgg u cie_ja;cf cou?
D~¤TRICT Cr- ArTlZON.A
ev mmm-. _____“3EPJ'T“<’_
United States v. Manuel ORTIZ-MORALES Docket No. 00CRO0043-001-PHX-RGS
· fl ·*"‘—;";"·-Qi T .,:1,,,;,
Petition to Revoke Supervised Release I " if ;jj}g._Vé'&»,.:.;§vp?;_g4i:A~·¢.! ii;
COMES NOW PROBATION OFFICER ASSISTANT Alicia R. Pineda presenting an official report
on Manuel ORTlZ—MORALES who was committed to the Bureau of Prisons March 16, 2000, by the
Honorable Roger G. Strand presiding inthe District Court of Arizona. A 36-month period of supervised
release was imposed, and supervision commenced upon the offenders discharge from imprisonment
October 13, 2004. In addition to the general terms and conditions adopted by the court in General Order
05-36, the offender was ordered to comply with the following special conditions:
1. If deported, you shall not re-enter the United States without legal authorization.
Manuel ORTIZ-MORALES was convicted of Illegal Re-entry After Deportation, a violation of 8 USC
§1326(a) & (b)(2), a Class C felony.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE
AS FOLLOWS:
Allegation A. Violation of Special Condition No. 1: lf deported, you shall not re-enter the United
States without legal authorization.
On or about December 1, 2005, Ortiz-Morales re—entered the United States without legal authorization.
This is evidenced by his arrest December 1, 2005, by the Border Patrol at or near the San Ysidro,
California, Port of Entry. This arrest was subsequent to his November 6, 2004 deportation. Grade C
Violation, §7B1.1(a)(3).
Case 2:00-cr-OOO43—NVW Document 19 Filed O1/24/2006 Page1 of2

· Page-2
·U.S·k v. Manuel ORTlZ—NlGi_,,~\LES -t,__,i
Docket No. 00CR00O43—001-PHX-RGS
January 10, 2006
AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER A WARRANT BE ISSUED
In conformance with the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1746, l declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Based on the information presented that the
offender has violated conditions of supervision, I am petitioning the Court to issue a warrant.
Alicia . Pineda, Date
U.S. Probation Officer Assistant
Rev'ewed by M
CP. iijg ,,jQ).;,£i jfregoia
Lori A. Wantland Date
Supervisory U.S. Probation Officer
Rev' wed by
Li Jenn s Date
Assistan U.S. Attorney
ORDER OF COURT
i find there is probable cause to believe the offender has violated conditions of supervision, supported
by the above affirmation given under penalty of perjury. The Court orders the issuance of a warrant.
Considered and ordered this SAG E"' day of =.1t.i·~t·»oa _ , 20¤ ‘·<* and ordered filed and
made a part of the records in the above case.
. to ·—··""’
1 rv 7 ` -- Q (}¤..—...-.
The Hono e Rog . Strand,
Sr. U.S. District Judge
Defense Counsel: J Wi
ir - i‘ ft
Atmore Baggot Li ; ;__ ;,;
1615 North Delaware " `" `J A `'nf
Apache Junction, Arizona 85250N 2 4 2006
Li. S3 PROM. imiv 0i=Fir3i;g iii? - f - i_=·` I is-D
i=*i-i»¢Zie;¤~.ii>: iiifiiiroiiiii -< ’ T -‘
Case 2:00-cr-OOO43—NVW Document 19 Filed O1/24/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:00-cr-00043-NVW

Document 19

Filed 01/24/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:00-cr-00043-NVW

Document 19

Filed 01/24/2006

Page 2 of 2