Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 54.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: January 24, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 444 Words, 2,671 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/19516/131.pdf

Download Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona ( 54.8 kB)


Preview Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTI-I CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AIVIERICA, No. 0440566
D.C. No. CR-02-00120-ROS
" Plaintiff- Appellee,
V.
JUDGMENT
` — _ HUDSON, _, _ _ _ , .. .. ...- » FA.- e . -
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
This cause came on to be heard on the Transcript of the Record from the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix) and was duly
submitted.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal of the said District Court in this cause be, and hereby is
r. I ED.~. W e -- .- WM. - A ee-. -» ·
Filed and entered 1 1/16/05 A A
Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS Document 131 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 3

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 16 2005
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS can-|yA_cA1·r5RsoN c|_ERK
us. coum or Appears
F OR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-10566
, Piainfiff - Appciicc. - _ D-G Ne- _,..,
v.
MEMoRANDUM*
DUANE HUDSON,
Defendant - Appellant. .
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2005** A
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Duane Hudson appeals the l20—month sentence imposed following his
guilty plea conviction for conspiracy with intent to distribute marijuana, in
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be 0
cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
M This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS Document 131 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 2 of 3

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and (b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). ‘
Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines,
we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409
F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. M0ren0—Hern¢1ndez, 419
·F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Amelineisr limited reinand procediiiéito ` " {
cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct.
738 (2005)).
REMANDED.
0 ( 3/Q-iiig/EAQ KEIERSON
,?l?é’é%**G°““---_ _
2 DEC ‘ 8 zag
Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS Document 131 Filed 12/08/200 9 A

Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS

Document 131

Filed 12/08/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS

Document 131

Filed 12/08/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cr-00120-ROS

Document 131

Filed 12/08/2005

Page 3 of 3