Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

-
Case 1 :08-cv-00295-GIVIS Docu · • 43 Filed 08/27/2008 Page 1 of 1
é•¥“£§T°‘\3‘é»°
° Pi *2
§" i
8. 5
"¤·=- mA·*“*°’ envu DIVISION (sez) En-S400 l
FAX (302] 577-6530
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CF"M`"’iEk>[€`§ii°’£§°¥$3£Sri?¤E’7?`B5°°
JOSEPH R. ETDEN, un 82¤NNE2i`é$GiEEEN°EE1US`ili`EET FR"UDFi}i¤Vi?$°$i°5?£€£$57`86°°
A1·roAN EY GENERAL wu.u¤NeToN, DELAWARE mam rw (sez) swam i
1
Please respond to: Civil Division
August 27, 2008 '
BV Electronic Filing
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
Chief Judge
- United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Caleb Boggs Federal Courthouse
844 N. King Streetf Lock Box 18
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Shahin v. Darling, et al.
CA. No. 08-295 GMS _
Dear Chief Judge Sleet:
I also join in Mr. Morse’s objection to Ms. Shahin’s "amended" brief. It is not simply a
sur-reply brief as it makes additional new arguments. Absent court approval, the brief should be
stricken.
While I understand Ms. Shahin’s desire to have the "last word", and while the court i
traditionally has given pro se litigants signiilcant leeway, I fear that providing such leeway in
this instance will result in Ms. Shahin seeking the "last word” in every instance.
Respectfully yours,
{sg jg evin Q. jliczttegy l
Kevin R. Slattery, No. 2297
Deputy Attorney General .
Xe. Nina Shahin (via U.S. Mail) 1
Richard H. Morse, Esq.
Norman H. Brooks, Jr., Esq.
Theodore J. Segletes, Ill, Esq.
File
I.·/Kevin.Slattery/Lingarion/Shnhin/Response 1*0 Amended Opposing Briefdoc
l
l
A -|

Case 1:08-cv-00295-GMS

Document 43

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 1 of 1