Free Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:08-cv-00243-JJF Document 6 Filed 05/19/2008 Page1 0f3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IVAN L. MENDEZ, :
Plaintiff, ;
v. S Civ. Action No. 08-243-JJF
LATISHA M. REED, Z
Defendant. ;
ORDER
1. Plaintiff, Ivan L. Mendez, SBI #453351, a prg sg
litigant who is presently incarcerated, has filed this action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without prepayment of the filing
fee.
2. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA") provides that
a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment
in a civil action in forma pauperis if he or she has three or
more times in the past, while incarcerated, brought a civil
action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed as
frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A case dismissed as
frivolous prior to the enactment of the PLRA (i.e., April 26,
1996) is counted when applying the "three strikes rule". Keener
v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole, 128 F.3d 143 (3d Cir.
1997). An exception is made to the “three strikes rule" when the
prisoner is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.
3. Plaintiff, while incarcerated, has filed at least three

Case1:O8-cv—00243—JJF D0cument6 Filed 05/19/2008 Page20f3
civil actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as
follows: Sao Mendez v. Delaware Corr. Ctr., Civ. No. 05-303-JJF
(Dec. 1, 2005); Mendez v. Delaware Legal Sys., Civ. No. 05-304-
JJF (Dec. 1, 2005); Mendez v. Delaware State, Civ. No. 05-305-JJF
(Dec. 1, 2005); Mendez v. Delaware Psychiatric Ctr., Civ. No. 05-
306-JJF (Dec. 1, 2005). After reviewing the Complaint, the Court
determines that Plaintiff has adequately alleged that, at time of
the filing of the Complaint, he was under imminent danger of
serious physical injury. Sao Williams v. Forte, No. 04-2071, 135
Fed. Appx. 520 (3d Cir. 2005); Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d
307, 311 (3d Cir. 2001).
4. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff has
submitted an affidavit stating that he has no assets with which
to prepay the filing fee. Based on Plaintiff’s affidavit, his
request to proceed fm forma pauperis is GRANTED. (D.I. 1.) His
second motion for leave to proceed fo forma pauperis is DENIED as
mq;. (111. 5.)
5. Notwithstanding the above, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(b)(1), Plaintiff shall be assessed the filing fee of
$350.00. In order to determine the schedule of payment of the
filing fee, Plaintiff shall submit to the Clerk of Court, a
certified copy of his trust fund account statement (memorandum or
institutional equivalent, with attachments) showing all deposits,
2

Case 1:08-cv-00243-JJF Document 6 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 3 of 3
eggenditures and balances during the six—month period immediately
preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the
appropriate official at the institution at which Plaintiff is
confined. FAILURE OF THE PLAINTIFF TO RETURN THE REQUESTED
INFORMATION WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THIS ORDER IS SENT SHALL
RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
6. Unless the Court determines from Plaintiff’s financial
information that he has no assets whatsoever, an initial partial
filing fee of 20 percent (20%) of the greater of Plaintiff’s
average monthly deposit or average monthly balance in the trust
fund account shall be required to be paid before the court
reviews the complaint. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PAYMENT MADE, THE
COURT SHALL DISMISS THE CASE IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT THE
ACTION IS FRIVOLOUS OR MALICIOUS, FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM UPON
WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED, OR SEEKS MONETARY RELIEF AGAINST A
DEFENDANT WHO IS IM UNE FROM SUCH RELIEF.
DATED: 5/(4fOK J.44 ’.
U ed `· .”· Dist gf udge
3

Case 1:08-cv-00243-JJF

Document 6

Filed 05/19/2008

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-00243-JJF

Document 6

Filed 05/19/2008

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:08-cv-00243-JJF

Document 6

Filed 05/19/2008

Page 3 of 3