Free Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 43.4 kB
Pages: 4
Date: June 23, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 850 Words, 5,303 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39808/32.pdf

Download Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware ( 43.4 kB)


Preview Response to Motion - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :08-cv-00104-SLR Document 32 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ` i
MOTOROLA, INC., )
Plaintiff )
)
v. )
) C. A. N0. 08-104-SLR
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED )
AND RESEARCH IN MOTION )
CORPORATION, ) 1
)
Defendants. )
PLAINTIFF MOTOROLA, INC .’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT RESEARCH IN i
MOTION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND
DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF . -
MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404ja)
Josy W. Ingersoll (No. 1088)
. Elena C. Norman (No. 4780)
Monté T. Squire (No. 4764)
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
TAYLOR, LLP
The Brandywine Building l
OF COUNSEL 1000 West Street, 17th Floor 1
Jesse J Jenner Wilmington, DE 19801
Stcvcipcpc Telephone: (302) 571-6600
» '
Roms & GRAY LLP 4l—@¥———mS me CS1 wm
Illia? $;§2u§;;t${;;Al;n;g§§ZS Attorneys for Plaintw Motorola, Inc.
Norman H. Beamer
ROPES & GRAY LLP
525 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301 I
Nicole M. Jantzi
ROPES & GRAY LLP
700 12th Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Dated: June 23, 2008
DB02;6915421.1 063522;.1003

Case 1:08-cv-00104-SLR Document 32 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 2 of 4
]
DISCUSSION
Motorola does not obj ect to RIM revising its declarations to state that two of the `
inventors of certain Motorola nonessential patents formerly resided in the Eastern District of
Texas.] As revised, RIM’s Supplementary Brief and Attorney Declaration declare that
"regardless of the present location of these inventors, discoverable information regarding the
work they performed in the Northern District of Texas in connection with the patents-in-suit
likely remains in that District." (Supp. Brf. at 3, Supp. Decl. 1] 6).
RIM is still incorrect-——the Motorola nonessential patents are not the patents—in-suit. The
only patents at issue before this Court are the RIM patents that are asserted against Motorola.
Those patents have named inventors from Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and New ersey. The
named inventors of two of the patents—in-suit are within the subpoena power of this Court, while
none are in Northern District of Texas.
RIM’s revised declarationdconfirms why its transfer motion must fail. When the Court
considers the facts that are relevant to the RIM patent claims, the Third Circuit’s Jumara test
overwhelmingly counsels that transfer is improper.
]
]

1 In its Reply Brief and attached Declaration, RIM stated that a Carrollton, Texas facility is
located in the Northern District of Texas. (Reply at 9; Mischler Reply Decl. 1] IO). However,
much of Carrollton, Texas is not located in the Northern District of Texas. RIM has not yet
confirmed the specific location of its Carrollton facility.
-1- !
DBo2;69is421.1 osaszsioos

Case 1 :08-cv-00104-SLR Document 32 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 3 of 4 l
Respectfully s
I ,l
Josy W. Ingersoll (No. 1088)
Elena C. Norman (No. 4780)
Monte T. Squire (No. 4764)
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
OF COUNSEL TAYLOR, LLP 1
The Brandywine Building 1
1000 West Street, 17th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801 A ,
ROPES & GRAY LLP . Telephone: (302) 571-6600 l
1211 Avenue of the Americas . 2 t lg
·
New Yelk, New York 10036 ms me CS mm
NOYHMH H- BGGYHGT Attorneys for Plaintw Motorola, Inc.
ROPES & GRAY LLP
525 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Nicole M. J antzi
ROPES & GRAY LLP V
700 12th Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
Dated: June 23, 2008 .
l
ll
ll
l
1

-2-
DB02:691542l.1 06332:;.1003

Case 1 :08-cv-00104-SLR Document 32 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE H
I hereby certify that on June 23, 2008, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification that such
filing is available for viewing and downloading to the following counsel of record:
Patricia Smink Rogowski, Esquire l
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP t
The Nemours Building y
1007 North Orange Street .
P. o. Box 2207 “
Wilmington, DE 19899
I further certify that on June 23, 2008, true and correct copies of the foregoing document
will be served by e-mail and hand delivery on the above listed counsel and on the following non-
registered participants as indicated below: ` A
BY E-MAIL V
William F. Lee, Esquire [[email protected]]
Michelle D. Miller, Esquire [[email protected]]
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP A
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
I
William J. Bohler [[email protected]]
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1
1117 California Avenue 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
TAYLOR,m
Josy W. Ingersoll (No. 1088)
Elena C. Norman (No. 4780) j
Monté T. Squire (No. 4764)
The Brandywine Building E
1000 West Street, 17th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 571-6600 0
[email protected]
D1302;66a49s9.1 063522;.1003

Case 1:08-cv-00104-SLR

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:08-cv-00104-SLR

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:08-cv-00104-SLR

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:08-cv-00104-SLR

Document 32

Filed 06/23/2008

Page 4 of 4