IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN RE: : Chapter ll
SA.FETY—I(LEEN, et al. , Case N0. 00-02303 [PJW)
: (Jointly Administered)
Debtors. :
CLEAN HARBORS, INC.,
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v. Adv. Proc. No. 05-50474 (PIW)
ARKEMA, INC., f/k/a ATOFlNA
CHEMICAL, INC., and also ELF : Related to Adv. Docket Nos. 71, 72, 74 & 78
ATOCHEM NORTH AMERICA, INC., :
HELEN KRAMER LANDFILL :
SUPERFUND SITE GROUP, and :
BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & :
INGERSOLL, LLP,l :
Defeiidants/Appellees.
DEFENDANTS’/APPELLEES†DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL ITEMS
TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD ON APPEAL
Defendants/Appellees ARKEMA, Inc. f/lc/a ATOFINA Chemical, Inc., and also
Elf Atochem North America, Inc. (“Arl
through their undersigned attorneys, and pursuant to Rule 8006 ofthe Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, hereby designates additional items to be included in the record on Clean
I Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP was dismissed as a defendant in this adversary
proceeding as a result ofthe dismissal of Count III of Clean Harbors Adversary
Complaint pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court’s Order and Memorandum Opinion, each
dated October 19, 2005. See Adv. Docket Nos. 15 & 16. The dismissal of Ballard Spahr
Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP irom the adversary proceeding was not appealed.
Case 1:08-cv—00087-G|\/IS Document 3 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 2 of 4
Harbors, 1nc.’s appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware’s (i)
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [Adv. Docket No. 71], and (ii) the accompanying
Judgment Order [Adv. Docket No. 72], each entered on January 3, 2008, as follows:
1. Defendants’ Trial Exhibit D—29: Delaware Secretary of State Corporate
Records for Safety—Kleen (Bridgeport), Inc.;
2. Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Count III of Plaintiff s Complaint, tiled
April 20, 2005 [Adv. Docket No. 5], with supporting Exhibits and Memorandum of Law;
3. Amended Complaint for (A) Declaratory Relief; and (B) Damages,
pursuant to Section l05(a) of the Bankruptcy Code due to Defendants’ Violation ofthe
lnjtmction Provisions of the Sale Order dated June 18, 2002 [DJ. 4932], filed on April 27, 2005
[Adv. Docket No. 6];
4. Plaintiff s Opposition to Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Count HI of
Plaintiffs [Amended] Complaint, tiled April 28, 2005 [Adv. Docket No. 7];
5. Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion of Defendants to
Dismiss Count HI of Plaintiff s [Amended] Complaint, filed April 28, 2005 [Adv. Docket No. 8];
6. Reply Memorandum of Law of Defendants in support of Motion to
Dismiss Count HI of Plaintiff? s [Amended] Complaint, Bled May 10, 2005 [Adv. Docket No.
11]; `
7. Stipulation of Counsel to Substitute Exhibit D to Complaint and Amended
Company, filed June 7, 2005 [Adv. Docket No. 14];
8. Answer and Counterclaim of Defendants, filed November 18, 2005 [Adv.
Docket No. 18] ; ‘
2
Case 1 :08-cv—00087-GIVIS Document 3 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 3 of 4
9. Answer to Counterclaims of Defendants, Arkema, Inc., Helen Kramer
Landfill Superfund Site Group, and Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, tiled December
19, 2005 [Adv. Docket No. 19];
10. Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment, filed March 22, 2006
[Adv. Docket No. 20];
11. Memorandum of Law of Defendants in support of Motion for Summary
Judgment, tiled March 22, 2006 [Adv. Docket No. 21];
12. Opposition of Clean Harbors, Inc. to Defendants†Motion for Summary
Judgment, filed May 5, 2006 [Adv. Docket No. 23];
13. Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Clean Harbors, Inc. in support
of Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Srunmary Judgment, filed May 5, 2006 [Adv. Docket
No. 24];
14. Reply Memorandum of Law of Defendants in support of Motion for
Summary Judgment, filed June 5, 2006 [Adv. Docket No. 25];
I5. Transcript of I-Iearing on Motion of Defendants to Compel the Testimony
of Raeford Craig Lackey or, in the alternative, to compel Production of Certain Documents
Requested, held on August 13, 2007 [Transcript ordered by Clean Harbors, Inc. on J anumy 24,
2008]; and
16. Order Regarding Post-Trial Procedures, entered on October 30, 2007
[Adv. Docket No. 64].
3
Case 1:08-cv—00087-G|\/IS Document 3 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 4 of 4
Respectfully submitted,
BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP
By: /s/ Leslie C. Heilman
Tobey M. Daluz, Esquire (No. 393 9)
Leslie C. Heilman, Esquire (N o. 4716)
919 Market Street, 1211] Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 252-4465
Facsimile: (302) 252-4466
E-mail: [email protected]
heilmanl@ballardspa1n·.com
-BI1d`..
Vincent J. Marriott, HI, Esquire
175 Market Street, 51Sl Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 665-8500
Facsimile: (215) 864-9762
E—mail: ma1·[email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees (
4
Case 1:08-cv-00087-GMS
Document 3
Filed 02/11/2008
Page 1 of 4
Case 1:08-cv-00087-GMS
Document 3
Filed 02/11/2008
Page 2 of 4
Case 1:08-cv-00087-GMS
Document 3
Filed 02/11/2008
Page 3 of 4
Case 1:08-cv-00087-GMS
Document 3
Filed 02/11/2008
Page 4 of 4
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms